Is time the 4th dimension or it dosen't really matter? Time has direction as well as magnitude so what unit vector should be used for time? Does antimatter really exist in the cosmos? and is time a multiple of the 3rd dimension
Idk anything about the 4th dimension, but yes antimatter does exist, and there have been theories for time in more than one dimension, but it requires advanced physics to really understand, you could probably learn a lot about time if you read up on special relativity.
If it (anti matter) exists theory of relativity would be incorrect if we travel through a black hole. relativity states that any body can't move faster than the speed of light. Then it must be possible to travel backwards in time. I heard that the higg's boson particle (God Particle) travels faster than the speed of light So is theory of relativity incorrect , then the whole physics might change.
maby using comlex number :)
Represent time? @ikram002p
i ment complex number , yeah time in space and stuff
You can never travel back in time
You can't but you can see back in time
Correct!
you can represent time with a third variable. If you look at the graph of Lorrentz transformations, thats one example of how they do it
Is there a method like calculus which we use for slopes for time
on top of that, the higgs boson is a quantum mechanics idea that unifies the source of fermions and bosons. This does not disprove relativity it itself. The report that the boson was moving fast than light was found to be a result of ERROR, and is not to be taken as true. Whether or not it CAN move faster than light, uh.....thats a bit more tricky. I personally don't believe it (And a lot of scientists agree lol, its not JUST my opinion) but you never know....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_diagram Here is what they are called. A graphical representation of Lorentz Transformations :P I forgot what their name was.
A method like calculus? What do you mean by slopes for time?
there can't be slopes
Yeah they can be
so we use calculus only
probably
...are you still asking question lol. anyways, in my basics quantum mechanics course, we usually had a set velocity when learning lorentz transformations, which made things a LOT easier, however I'd assume that if you wanted to REALLY model anything with respect to time, you'd need multivariable calculus. We also used a lot of linear algebra when learning quantum mechanics (eigenvalues, eigenstates) so you'd probably need vector calculus as well.
well thank you dude I just watched a cosmos show on national geographic and got endless list of questions
ahah no problem, Modern Physics is really interesting stuff. Can be a little hard to wrap your mind around it alone though, so I'd highly recommend taking a course in it (as long as the teacher/prof is good).
yes
Technically we live in a 4 dimensional world called minkowski space which does have a time component as one of its dimensions and time unit vectors do not really come up as useful constructs in physics, or at least the physics ive encountered so far. i cant account for string theory or things like that.
now the difference between describing space in 4 dimensional space-time and just 3 dimensional parametric equations that are functions of time, is that the space-time analog is useful when you are dealing with relativist effects otherwise our normal 3 dimensional reference frame works just fine
antimatter does exist we have been able to create it in laboratories however we have not (as far as we know) detected any large formations of antimatter out there in the cosmos our observable universe appears to be dominated by ordinary matter and we do not know why
this physicist named richard feynman created the theory of quantum electrodynamics this theory explains quantum effects of maxwells electromagnetism and in this theory we draw what are called feynman diagrams which usually look something like this...
luckily I was just learning about this stuff in class this semester
i think the more important discovery is actually the recent one that proves cosmic inflation existed in the very early universe
cosmic inflation was basically a very rapid and exponential growth at the birth of our universe that lasted for a little bit and then slowed down for some reason if the discovery holds then it means we have no choice but to reconcile quantum mechanics and gravity
which would ultimately lead to a grand unified theory
Right, time is not the 4th dimension imo. First, Space-Time is the fourth dimension.Second, yes anti-matter is said to exist when there are anti-particles which have opposite charges, spins and masses to their opposite counterparts such as electrons and positrons. lastly, time being a multiple of the third dimension ? there're three natural dimensions length, mass and time so time being a multiple of itself doesn't seem appropriate does it ?
|dw:1399023332367:dw| this is called a feynman diagram and the arrows represent subatomic particles a straight arrow represents a particle with mass where a squiggly arrow represents a photon and where two arrows meet is where an interaction occurs
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!