Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

log5(x)+log3(x)=1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what is log m+log n=?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

they are multiplied

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what to do with log base 5 and log base 3 since they are different?

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

so the question is \[\log_{5}(x) + \log_{3}(x) = 1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes campbell_st

OpenStudy (campbell_st):

ok... you need to use change of base.... and change them to either base 10 or base e the change of base formula is \[\log_{a}(m) = \frac{\ln(m)}{\ln(a)}\] and ln(a) becomes just a number.... hope it helps

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

log m + log n = log mn is what @kaylady21 meant.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, but they have different bases.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Good point indeed!! The bases ARE different. Therefore, we must choose one base to keep and must write the other log in terms of the one we keep.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How do you do that? :)

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Before we do any more, let me verify that the bases here are 3 and 5. Is that what you meant?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, that is what I meant @mathmale

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

Then follow what @campbell_st said earlier.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

\[\log_{5} x+\log_{3}x=1 \]

OpenStudy (mathmale):

If that's correct, let's stick with one base: 3. We must then convert that base 5 log to base 3. @klady21, can you convert (log to the base 5 of x to base 3?

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

Or better yet, apply this following rule: \[\log_{b}a =\frac{ 1 }{ \log_{a}b } \]

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

Example, \[\log_{5}x =\frac{ 1 }{ \log_{x} 5 } \]

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

As long as x > 0; x ≠ 1

OpenStudy (mathmale):

@calculusfunctions: would you mind demonstrating how you'd convert log-to-the-base-3 into a base e expression? I'm used to the change of base formula that reads like this:\[\log_{a} x=\frac{ \ln x }{ \ln a }\]

OpenStudy (mathmale):

And thus, I'd convert \[\log_{5} x\] as follows:\[\log_{5}x=\frac{ \log_{3} x }{ \log_{3} 5 } \]

OpenStudy (mathmale):

So the expression \[\log_{5}x+\log_{3}x=1 \]

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

Alright then, \[\log_{3}x =\frac{ \ln x }{ \ln 3 } \]

OpenStudy (mathmale):

would become\[\frac{ \log_{3} x }{ \log_{3} 5 }+\log_{3}x=1 \]

OpenStudy (mathmale):

@calculusfunctions : Are we in agreement with this last result?

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

Absolutely @mathmale You are correct!

OpenStudy (mathmale):

OK, then obviously our next step is to solve for log-to-the-base-3-of-x, and, finally, for x itself. @kaylady21? What would you suggest we do next? If you're sure of what to do, do it, please.

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

Remember @mathmale and everyone else, that the important thing is to lead her to the correct solution. NOT DO IT for her!!!!

OpenStudy (mathmale):

@reemii: I have trouble with the fact that you've put log x into the denominators of two fractions.

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

@reemii you are also correct. It's the same as what @mathmale said.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

There has to be a mathematically logical reason for every step we take.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

@kaylady21: we have to be careful not to take your math problem and run with it. Could you let the rest of us know what you are thinking at this point?

OpenStudy (reemii):

indeed. x=1 is forbidden at the moment. but we can see in the first equation that x=1 is not a solution. so we can go on safely. however this must be said. thanks @mathmale

OpenStudy (calculusfunctions):

Yes @mathmale I just realized that. The log x is not in the denominators.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am getting confused. I got to the point you did but after that....I'm not sure.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you need to find like denominators?

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Not really. Let me go back to what I proposed before:

OpenStudy (mathmale):

\[\frac{ \log_{3}x }{ \log_{3}5 }+\log_{3} x=1\]

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Note that both of the terms on the left have log=-to-the-base-3-of-x in them. This suggests that we could factor that common term out. Anyone care to try doing that?

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Remember, our goals are first to find log-to-the-base-3 of x first and x itself second.

OpenStudy (mathmale):

|dw:1399154467381:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!