Logarithm Question.... If y = \(a^{\left(\cfrac{1}{1-\log_a x}\right)} \) and z = \(a^{\left(\cfrac{1}{1-\log_a y}\right)}\) then x = ?
If y = \(a^{\left(\cfrac{1}{1-\log_a x}\right)} \) and z = \(a^{\left(\cfrac{1}{1-\log_a y}\right)}\)
@Kainui and @iambatman
This is what I have done yet : In order to get rid of the powers, I took log both sides : \(\log y = \cfrac{1}{1-\log_a x} \log a\) and \(\log z = \cfrac{1}{1-\log_a y} \log a\)
Okay, let us try to simplify it more. \(\log y = \left(\cfrac{1}{1-\log_a x} \right)\left(\cfrac{1 }{\log x}\right)\) \(\log x \times \left(1-\log_a x\right) = \cfrac{1}{\log y}\) \(\log x \times \left(1-\cfrac{\log a}{\log x }\right) = \cfrac{1}{\log y}\)
Seems like, I have made it more complicated.
This is what I have got after a lot of work : \(\log_a \left(\cfrac{a}{x}\right) = \log_a \left(\cfrac{a}{y}\right) \times \left(\cfrac{\log y}{\log z}\right)\)
and making the bases same for everything : \(\log_a \left(\cfrac{a}{x}\right) = \log_a \left(\cfrac{a}{y}\right) \times \left(\cfrac{\log_a z}{\log_a y}\right) \)
\(\cfrac{a}{x} = \left(\cfrac{a}{y}\right)^{\left(\cfrac{\log_a z}{\log_a y}\right)}\)
\(\log_a(z)=\frac{1}{1-\log_a(y)}\\1-\frac{1}{\log_a(z)}=\log_a(y)\\y=a^{\frac{\log_a(z-1)}{\log_a(z)}}\) now \(y=a^{\frac{1}{1-\log_a(x)}}\implies a^{\frac{\log_a(z-1)}{\log_a(z)}}=a^{\frac{1}{1-\log_a(x)}}\implies \frac{\log_a(z-1)}{\log_a(z)}=\frac{1}{1-\log_a(x)}\implies \\x=a^{\frac{\log_a(z)-\log_a(z-1)}{\log_a{z-1}}}\)
I think...
What you have written is though, not visible ot me, but yes, I'm getting what you did.
brb
I'm getting after a lot of disgusting looking algebra that if we use the same form of function, x(z) has the same form as y(x) and z(y) shown above. \[\Large x=a^{\frac{1}{1-\log_az}}\]
Well, may be these options help us : \(\boxed{\\ \text{(A)} \quad a^{\cfrac{1}{1+\log_a z}} \\ \text{(B)} \quad a^{\cfrac{1}{2+ \log_a z}} \\ \text{(C)} \quad a^{\cfrac{1}{1-\log_a z}} \\ \text{(D)} \quad \text{None of these} \\ }\)
@Kainui - Yeah your answer seems to be right, as it is in the options.
I'm getting c, and here's my algebra for checking give me a moment...
I solved in general, \[\Large h=a^{\frac{1}{1-\log k}} \]\[\Large \log h=\frac{1}{1-\log k}\]\[\Large 1-\log k=\frac{1}{\log h}\]\[\Large 1-\frac{1}{\log h}= \log k\]\[\Large k=a^{ 1-\frac{1}{\log h}}\] Now since h(k) is the same form as both y(x) and z(y) we can plug in each equation to itself... One sec...
We now have found k(h) so we really have x(y) and y(z) now so we simply find x(y(z)) since that's what all our answer choices are.
\[\Huge x(y(z))=a^{ 1-\frac{1}{\log (a^{ 1-\frac{1}{\log h}})}}\]The log and a part in the exponent cancel out. \[\Huge x=a^{ 1-\frac{1}{ 1-\frac{1}{\log h}}}\] From here we simplify the fractions \[\Huge x=a^{ 1-\frac{1}{ \frac{\log h -1}{\log h}}}\]\[\Huge x=a^{ 1-\frac{\log h}{ \log h -1}}\]\[\Large x=a^{ \frac{\log h -1 -\log h}{ \log h -1}}\]\[\Large x=a^{ \frac{-1}{ \log h -1}}=a^{ \frac{1}{ 1-\log h }}\] But I can't help but feel like there's a better way of doing this one. Also I just realized all those h's should be z's. Whatever.
Well, yeah, I think this is one of the ways of solving this quesiton,,,, but there must be an easier way to get to the answer.
Obviously there's a symmetry going on here, but it beats me how it works. Really cool problem.
This is what we can do : \((1-\log_a x)(\log y) = (1-\log_a y)(\log z)\)
I think I got it.
What is it? I think there's a really nice solution to this that's really fast.
This might be better: h(k) has the form of y(x) and z(y) k(h) has the form x(y) and y(z). So we can set y(x)=y(z) if we just play around with the general equation. \[\Large h=a^{1-\frac{1}{\log k}}\] Ok so skipping the little algebra I get to these two equations from this one. \[\Large \log h=1-\frac{1}{\log k}\]\[\Large \log k=\frac{1}{1-\log h}\] Above when I said y(x)=y(z) this also means log[y(x)]=log[y(z)] So let's do that. \[1-\frac{1}{\log x}=\frac{1}{1-\log z}\] Solve for x. I don't know if this is really that much better hmm... I feel like there's a really satisfying way to recognize that y(x), z(y) and x(z) are all identical forms without having to do anything at all.
Sorry, my net stopped working.
Yeah, I agree Kainui that there should be much satisfying way to do this.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!