Method of separation of variables: pic attached
not sure entirely where to start
I'd listen to their advice, start out with the standard separation of variables. \[\Theta (x,t) = X(x)T(t)\] plug this into the wave equation. \[\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial t^2}=4\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial x^2}\]\[\frac{\partial^2 (XT)}{\partial t^2}=4\frac{\partial^2 (XT)}{\partial x^2}\]since X doesn't depend on t and T doesn't depend on x, we pull them out of the derivatives\[X\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial t^2}=4T\frac{\partial^2 X}{\partial x^2}\]Since we know that the only derivative of T is of t and of X is also of x, we just replace them to make it easier on the eyes to look at \[XT''=4TX''\]Now we start the trick by putting all x and t parts on each side of the equation \[\frac{T''}{T}=4\frac{X}{X''}\]This is interesting. Since X and T are both functions, that means we can plug in anything. But then that would mean one function of x is really dependent upon t and the other way around because they're equal! That must mean then that these are equal to constants to maintain that they're not dependent on each other. \[\frac{T''}{T}=4\frac{X}{X''}=-\lambda^2\] Here I've just chosen negative lambda squared because I'm anticipating what we did last time with the sines and cosines. I hope that can get you started. Ask me anything if you need more help.
It would be appropriate to solve around T first?
So \[T ^{''}+\lambda^2 T=0\]
\[T ^{''}+\mu^2 T=0\]
and we know \[\mu=\frac{ \pi(2n-1) }{ 6 }\]
nup im still unsure
Actually you can solve both at the same time as long as you notice that the constant they're equal to is slightly different, and plug it in for each one at the end if that makes sense.
where\[T _{n}=\sin(\lambda x)\] assuming we are indexing from n=0
now to solve for the X equation. \[\lambda^2 X ^{''}+4\lambda=0\]
4X instead of 4L
where do i go from here @Kainui
Plug in X=e^{ax} and solve it like a normal ODE for a.
Yep! i found the general solution for X
what do i do with that? Solve for initial conditions?
@mathslover
@dan815 HELP A BRO OUT
BRO too long!
where have u been
@Bswan
its crrrraaaaa right now. been stuyding hey. exams soon. Last semeter for engineering maths as well! So sad.
haha im on summer :P
wow. thats fked
omg
okay so u only learnt the separation of var method for solving PDE right
thinking of going to toronto to study 1st sem next yr aye
yep. thats right
Kainui has started it
thats sick
didn't say ur in canada?
yeah
okay now do the 3 cases for lambda
for T?
lemme check something
whats ur final solution for x? initial condition is used to give the constant that u would have
ive done the lamda cases for T''=-L^2T
think is that im not sure what i'm doing - got so much on my plate right now.
thing*
show me theta (x,t) or u dint solve it yet ?
haven't solved yet thats what you want to find out though?
ohh , i thought u asking specific qn u wanna the whole sol ?
yea!! if u look up the top, kainui has started it for me
providing a equation with both T and X
for \[T''=-\lambda ^2 T\]
i've already solved for the eigenvalues and eigen function for them in a previous question - not sure if you need them though
no need i think we gotta just express in fourier serie right
wait at \(\lambda ^2 x'' + u \lambda=0\) untill here its good ?
i'm not sure if thats right though it should be 4X''/X
are we refering to kainui's initial workings?
yes kianui work is perfect
if you re-arrange the second to last step though it should be 4X''/X though?
only if u chick from last equation with lambda u and x xD plz check it xD
whereas he wrote 4X/X''
where did you get 'u' from?
thats what im calling the theta
don't we just want to deal with \[\frac{T''}{T}=4\frac{X}{X''}=-\lambda^2\]
yeah lets do it from here agian
@rational
and forget the lambda^2 call it lambda
ahk\[\frac{T''}{T}=4\frac{X}{X''}=\lambda\]
T''+lamT=0, what the boundary conditions given for x or t?
and shud that be 4X''/X=lambda
boundary conditions are 0
X(0)=0, X(L)=0 X''+lambaX=0 <--- lets change your equations to T''/4T = X''/x =-Lamba
so the 3 possibilties lamba =0, lamba = -k^2 , lamba =k^2
correct
we would only get eigenvalues of 0 if we look at the first two possibilites right?
so only look at lamba=k^2?
X(x)=c1+c2x X(x)=c1coshax+c2sinhax X(X)=c1cos ax + c2 sin ax X(4pi)=0, x(0) =0
yeah so u left with the cos solutions only
correct!
X(x)=c2sin npix/L, n=1,2,3... L=4pi
Now we need T(t) to find X(t)T(t) for some n
i mean X(x)T(t)
right
as we said theta = X(x)T(t)
yep
what did u get for T(t)
c3cos(...)+c4sin(..)?
is the boundary condition for T t(0)=0?
Do we need that to find that?
ah this is fkd. do we use what they give us for T''-lamdaT=0?
where eigen function is cos(nx)/4
we rearrange it like remember T''/4T = X''/x =-Lamba
so solve T''+4LambaT=0
ah T''+4lamdaT=0
so now find general solution of T?
given that T'(0)=0?
wait im lemme check something is our general solution for X(X) right
whats a?
u are only left with c2 sin nx/4 right?
with boundary condition for X(0)=0?
and X(4pi)=0
isn't it X'(0)=0? and X'(4pi)=0?
oh are u serious
ye cuz
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!