Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let \(n\) be some natural number and let \(\theta\) and \(\phi \) be in the interval \([0,2\pi)\). Suppose \(\theta\) and \(n\phi\) are equivalent angles (congruent modulo \(2\pi\)). Find the general solution for \(\phi\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This was an interesting problem I thought about last night.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm wondering if I'm understanding the question properly, so bear with me. Suppose \(\theta=\dfrac{\pi}{2}\), then \(\phi\) can be any of \(\dfrac{\pi}{2},~\dfrac{\pi}{4},~\dfrac{\pi}{6},~\cdots\), or \(\phi=\left\{\dfrac{\pi}{2n}\right\}_{n=1}^\infty\) Is the question asking for the general form of \(\phi\), as in a set of angles, for any \(\theta\) in the interval?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The solution for \(\phi\) as a set of angles.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Basically, there are multiple solutions.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

\(\theta \mod 2\pi = n \phi \mod 2\pi \)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so if \(\theta\) was \(\dfrac{\pi}{2}\), my solution for \(\phi\) is correct?

OpenStudy (dan815):

first thing im thinking about is a set of prime numbers would be involved in n, for theta=nphi, and then +2*k*pi to that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@SithsAndGiggles Let me look at your solution for a moment, I don't quite get it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@wio sure take your time, I'm just trying to wrap my mind around the question.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

\(\theta = n \phi+m 2\pi\)

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

mmm diophantine equation

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@SithsAndGiggles Okay, there is a problem with you solution. First of all, \(n\) is a constant natural number, it is not a free variable but you are using it as one. Second of all, it is missing solutions, I believe.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1403642332712:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1403642367138:dw||dw:1403642412064:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That would be \(\theta = \pi/2\) and \(n=2\) solutions.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

if \(\theta =\frac{ \pi }{2}\) then \(n\phi\)= \(\theta +m2\pi\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

One other thing I want to add. I want a unique set of solutions. So I don't want repeats. If you create a free variable for expressing solutions (as is necessary), then give that variable some bounds.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So you're saying for \(\theta=\dfrac{\pi}{2}\), you have \(\phi=\dfrac{\pi}{4}\) and \(\dfrac{5\pi}{4}\) as solutions? Okay, I see... I used the bracketed sequence notation in place of a set to account of for any value of \(n\). What I meant was that \(\phi=\dfrac{\pi}{4}\) was the only solution in the case that \(n=2\), which is clearly not a complete solution since \(2\cdot\dfrac{5\pi}{4}=\dfrac{5\pi}{2}\equiv\dfrac{\pi}{2}\text{ mod }2\pi\). Okay, I got it now. Interesting question indeed. As a conjecture, I'd guess that there are \(n\) solutions for a given \(n\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, only when \(n=2\) are those the solutions.

OpenStudy (dan815):

what about like

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So you need to generalize to the \(n\)th case.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Right, let's see what the others can come up with :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have a solution in my head already. I wanna see what others do.

OpenStudy (dan815):

cases where its not possible to meet in 1 rotation or 2 theta = pi/5 and phi = pi/7 n*pi/7=pi/5+2kpi

OpenStudy (dan815):

n*phi=Theta + 2k pi solutions to this are from diophantine

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are you saying the general solution can't be expressed as a function?

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

mm well , we can solve diophantine like this ? x=theta y=n phi x=y mod 360 mmm too much variables , but we have interval [0,360) for x , y

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The thing is, these angles don't have to be rational or anything. They can be real numbers.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

ik mm im still thinking of it maby mod thingy wont work

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

maybe*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The thing about\[ \phi = \frac{\theta +2\pi k}{n} \]is how to limit it to unique solutions.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

When \(k = n\), we have: \[ \phi = \frac{\theta + 2\pi n}{n} = \frac\theta n+2\pi \]So at this point, the solutions have begun to repeat.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

When \(k=0\) we get the more trivial solution: \[ \phi = \frac \theta n \]This one will always apply.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\(k\) can't be negative, otherwise we get a negative \(\phi\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I've started seeing that kind of pattern. Keeping to my example with \(\theta=\dfrac{\pi}{2}\), I've been considering one \(n\) at a time: \[\begin{matrix}\underline{n}&&&\underline{\phi}\\ 1&&&\frac{\pi}{2}\\ 2&&&\frac{\pi}{4},\frac{5\pi}{4}\\ 3&&&\frac{\pi}{6},\frac{5\pi}{6},\frac{9\pi}{6}\\ 4&&&\frac{\pi}{8},\frac{5\pi}{8},\frac{9\pi}{8},\frac{13\pi}{8} \end{matrix}\] If you were to plot these angles, you'd see the plane divided equally into \(n\) parts. Now, notice that \[\frac{\pi}{2}\equiv\frac{5\pi}{2}\equiv\frac{9\pi}{2}\equiv\frac{13\pi}{2}\equiv\cdots\equiv\frac{(4k+1)\pi}{2}\equiv\frac{\pi}{2}\text{ mod }2\pi\] for \(k=0,1,2,...\). So judging by that, I would expect \[\phi=\frac{\pi}{10},\frac{5\pi}{10},\frac{9\pi}{10},\frac{13\pi}{10},\frac{17\pi}{10}\] I haven't checked for other values of \(\theta\) yet, but I'm convinced the pattern (or something similar) will hold.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

its 3:49 AM lol cant open my eyes O.O so sith just need to check other values of theta mmm cant wait to see wio general solution :-\

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, first thing I did consider was just \(n=2\). You have two solutions: |dw:1403670498372:dw| So you have \(\theta /2\) and you have \(2\pi -\theta/2\)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!