Which sentence correctly uses a parallel structure to convey the intended meaning?

We found the houses looted, the broken bridges, and the burned farms.

We found houses that were looted, bridges that were broken, and farms that had been burned.

We found that the houses were looted, that the bridges were broken, and that the farms had been burned.

We found that the houses had been looted, the bridges had been broken, and the farms had been burned.

Question

Which sentence correctly uses a parallel structure to convey the intended meaning?

We found the houses looted, the broken bridges, and the burned farms.

We found houses that were looted, bridges that were broken, and farms that had been burned.

We found that the houses were looted, that the bridges were broken, and that the farms had been burned.

We found that the houses had been looted, the bridges had been broken, and the farms had been burned.

anonymous · Answer

D. We found that the houses had been looted, the bridges had been broken, and the farms had been burned. "had been", "had been", "had been" Has to be the same it's parallel. link: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/623/01/ This link makes it easy to understand. I'm trying to make a site that helps with this stuff lol: http://www.platoisevil.info It's no where near done.