Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Help with induction problem:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

myininaya (myininaya):

so you are just having a problem on the inductive step?

myininaya (myininaya):

you need to show it for the first case n=1 now assume it is true for some integer k actually write down what you are assuming you might want to also write down what you want to show look what you can do to the inductive step to get what you want to show

myininaya (myininaya):

hint: recall an inequality still holds if you multiply both sides of it by a positive number

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So multiply both sides by 2^(n+1)?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

start with the assumption that it is true for some n.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

n=1 is true.

myininaya (myininaya):

okay now write down what you are assuming is true

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So assuming that for all \[n \ge 1\] It'll be true?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

multiply by 2, an and notice k-2< k-1

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

when k is natural...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

When k is natural, it'll always be true.

myininaya (myininaya):

I'm saying write down what you are assuming is true: \[\text{ Assume } 2^k \le 2^{k+1}-2^{k-1}-1 \text{ for some integer } k \ge 1 \]

myininaya (myininaya):

do some manipulation to show that the following is true: I'm saying take the assumption and show the following is true: \[2^{k+1} \le 2^{(k+1)+1}-2^{(k-1)+1}-1 \] let me rewrite this you need to show: \[2^{k+1} \le 2^{k+2}-2^k-1\] you get to use the following assumption \[\text{ Assume } 2^k \le 2^{k+1}-2^{k-1}-1 \text{ for some integer } k \ge 1\] and any other math things you know like -2<-1 or if you have x>y then 2x>2y.

myininaya (myininaya):

what can you do to the assumption to get to what you want!

myininaya (myininaya):

i wonder how one can get from 2^k to 2^(k+1)

myininaya (myininaya):

i wonder what 2^(k+1)/2^k is

myininaya (myininaya):

i wonder if i can use law of exponents there to simplify that above thingy

myininaya (myininaya):

thingy quotient whatever

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I gotcha. I'll keep working on it now, and post if I run into trouble later.

myininaya (myininaya):

and remember if x<y then 2x<2y or for that mather mx<my for any m>0

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

\(2^n\le2^{n+1}-2^{n-1}-1\) is the assumption what you want \(2^{n+1}\le 2^{n+2}-2^n-1\) so take \(2^n\le2^{n+1}-2^{n-1}-1\) and multiply it by \(2\) \(2*2^n\le2*2^{n+1}-2*2^{n-1}-2*1\le ?\)

myininaya (myininaya):

matter * not mather

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So set k = k+1, and the assumption turns into what we want, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

n = n+1, right? *

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

?

myininaya (myininaya):

i'm not sure what you are saying

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

n=n+1????

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

2*2^n = 2^{n+1}

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

do that a bunch

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohh, that makes more sense. Disregard what I said.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!