Question

What are the main arguments about the judiciary put forth by Hamilton for ratifying the Constitution and Brutus against ratifying the Constitution?

Answer 1

google says no

Answer 2

WHat??? My question is what ARE the main arguments.... -_-

Answer 3

i dont know if american google is bringing up any results because Australian google isnt

Answer 4

i know that, i'm just saying that the internet isnt really helping have you got a text book?

Answer 5

this question is really hard

Answer 6

nah, the question is easy enough, the available resources are non-existant

Answer 7

Oh lol. Sorry praetorian.. I thought you were messing with me. That happens a lot on this site.

Answer 8

No prob Kiddo

Answer 9

I am honestly trying to find your answer

Answer 10

i need answere to my questio

Answer 11

I think the answer would be Hamilton believed that the judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest because "no influence over either the sword or the purse, ...It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment." This meant that Hamilton believed it would leave the branch for interpretation... Is this right.. kinda?

Answer 12

Ugh nevermind.. I have no idea...

Answer 13

lol

Answer 14

nice determination though

Answer 15

Hahaha yeah I'm just going to make something up

Answer 16

hahaah

Answer 17

in the army they used to say: Improvise, Adapt, Overcome.

Answer 18

having fun @IloveCharlie ?

Answer 19

Lol. I just finished... Ugh heres a medal for your thoughtfulness

Answer 20

you didnt need to give me a medal....i was simply asking if you were dead or not