Question

HOW CAN YOU SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF HOW TO FIX THE HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE IN HIROSHIMA @quickstudent @gswag98 @jim_thompson5910 @hippo4 @HatcrewS @hales182

Answer 1

OK, where is the link to the book?

Answer 2

http://learn.flvs.net/educator/common/Steinig/English2Novelsebooks/hiroshima.pdf

Answer 3

Oh boy, I don't have time to go through the book. I have lots of work to do myself.

Answer 4

Can you just take notes on whatever you are going to have in your essay? I can help you with writing the essay, but I don't have the time to look through the book.

Answer 5

just take a review of the book on spark note

Answer 6

Do you know of any articles? That's what I use, it's a lot easier than going through a book, at least for me. You can get a lot of information very quick.

Answer 7

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/hiroshima/facts.html

Answer 8

Are you writing an essay about the book or the event? If it is about the event, than you need more information than this.

Answer 9

no look at the more things in the site

Answer 10

there are more things on the website look at the summary and that nonsense

Answer 11

i am trying to look for the situation only

Answer 12

like as in the bombing not as in the book

Answer 13

Ok, I understand now. Can I have a couple days to do this? I can't do it now, I am very busy.

Answer 14

yes sure will tomorrow or the day after be sufficient

Answer 15

It should be, but I don't know when my teacher might give me extra homework, so if it takes a little longer than that, will it be okay?

Answer 16

well i need it by max 2 days lol im sorry but any help will be sufficient

Answer 17

Oh, well maybe you should have help from more than one person, than. Then you should get it done.

Answer 18

i would love help form more people

Answer 19

Sorry, but I won't be able to do it in two days :( , my homework is already taking up more than half my bed time. I will try to find some more people to help you.

Answer 20

yes please

Answer 21

omg why was i tagged? XD

Answer 22

I'm pretty sure we've suggested before that you not tag the whole world. It is actually rather like spam and not helpful. While it may do a little toward getting attention, the attention may be what I have included here in this post.

Answer 23

USE THIS LINK http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/hiroshima/facts.html

Answer 24

What are the "THE HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE IN HIROSHIMA"?

Answer 25

the one about how the people got killed

Answer 26

NO HELP

Answer 27

NO ONE HELPES ME

Answer 28

THE HUMAN RIGHST ISSUE IS GENOCIDE

Answer 29

Portion of the Code of Conduct

Please do not copy and paste your problems. If people are going to spend time to help you, you should at least spend the time to ask your question as clearly as possible.

This is what you are doing. You did ask a question, but you provided no evidence of personal effort. You have this question because you are supposed to THINK about it. Well, think about it and let's see what you get. Perhaps someone else can point out expansions or shortcomings of your initial attempts.

YOU have to work in order for someone to help you properly.

Which people were killed? When? Was there a recent riot? Are we talking about the A-Bomb? Ask a real question and provide YOUR efforts. This is what will help you. Tagging everyone, either one at a time or 12 at a time is not your solution.

Answer 30

I DID not copy and past my question

Answer 31

i write it my self

Answer 32

Even if that is true, please respond to the other eight things I said. Where have you shown any work of your own?

Answer 33

I graduate high school budd sorry I may not be of any help :(

Answer 34

Japanese people in 1945 there was the recent yes there was pearl harbor and it was a bombing in 2 bombs Hiroshima and Nagasaki @

Answer 35

Genocide was not an issue in the A-Bomb usage of Hiroshima. That is a ridiculous accusation. The estimated losses of a full-scale invasion were greater than the total deaths of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by an order of magnitude! No one wanted to wipe Japanese from the planet. It was not even a thought. The thought was, "We are ready for an invasion, but let's see if this works before we kill TWO MILLION people with a ground invasion." I'm not seeing a human rights violation, there. It's a horrible choice, to be sure, but genocide? No.

Answer 36

sorry i meant Japanese people were killed and it was in 1945 and the recent thing was in pearl harbor and it was 2 bombings Hiroshima and Nagasaki and btw thanks the effort @i0iz0gangster

Answer 37

hey @tkhunny its not my descision i have to find the human rights isuue of genocide in Hiroshima and to find a way to solve it

Answer 38

I just told you how to solve it. The way to stop the bombing was:

1) Surrender - save a little face and honor and give up plans for world domination, which is the only human rights violation I'm aware of in this circumstance.
2) Full-Scale invasion -- Kill 10 times as many people and create a bigger human rights issue.

It is a grave fallacy that any war at all simply constitute a human rights issue. People have a right to defend themselves. If the threat is lethal force, then a reasonable response of lethal force may be appropriate. We can second guess all we want into the future.

You can argue to the contrary.

If you can find a human rights issue with 1945 Hiroshima and the A-Bomb, I'd like to hear it. So far, I haven't heard that one actually exists. I have not at any time heard a credible argument that outweighs 2,000,000 deaths related to a full-scale invasion. \(\huge{2,000,000!!!}\) That's a really big number.

Answer 39

OK THANKS SO MUCH @tkhunny

Answer 40

If there was a human rights issue related to genocide, it was a failure of the Island Power to surrender on better terms. They could have negotiated a better surrender, but they failed to do so. See that surrender choice? That would have stopped the full-scale invasion AND the A-Bombs. It was the choice of the local government to sacrifice its own citizens in massive numbers that constitutes anything related to genocide in this situation.

And, you are welcome. Studying this sort of thing requires discussion. Next time, pose your question AND your initial thoughts.

Answer 41

so can you give me 1 soulution from the USA point of view

Answer 42

like how the USA could have handeled it better

Answer 43

The thing is this, the Americans had shown, island by island, that they were determined to end the war by Japanese surrender. That was the ONLY solution in the minds of the U.S. Military. Could it have been handled better? Yes, and it was. The full-scale invasion was handled better by producing 1/10 of the expected deaths. The use of the A-Bomb WAS the more humane solution. The 1st bomb should have done the trick. Why didn't it? Normally, when facing an overwhelming enemy, the RIGHT thing to do is to back down. We see this over and over and over in the animal kingdom where combatants don't need to kill each other. The weaker eventually concedes and gives up his aggressive posture. Of course, animals don't tend to suffer from arrogance.

The other important issue is one of morality. Who started the war and why? What was their design and purpose? According to the Founding Fathers of the U.S.A., as shown in those all-important initial documents, man is endowed with rights and freedoms by God! The ONLY way for Americans to back down was (and is) to tear up the Constitution. This is why we have such difficulty with the so-called "War on Terrorism". It is so much less clear who the enemy is, why they are the enemy, and who actually holds the moral high ground. There was no such ambiguity in WWII.

Answer 44

thanks @tkhunny

Answer 45

Well, anyone can have an opinion. Good luck finding authoritative sources. :-)

Answer 46

can you give me a solution from an outside source please like how some one outside could have solved it sorry @tkhunny

Answer 47

or @quickstudent could you help me in the last one

Answer 48

Well, I can't do it today anymore, is tomorrow ok?

Answer 49

yea sure

Answer 50

Martians. The Martians could have used their mind-control ray guns. :-)