Plz help i will give medal and i will fan ^~^
A company makes rugs in two sizes. A small size rug requires 2 hours for dyeing and 4 hours for knotting. A medium size rug requires 3 hours for dyeing and 6 hours for knotting. The company's dyeing unit cannot work for more than 40 hours in a week, and the knotting unit cannot work for more than 50 hours in week. Let S represent the number of small size rugs that the company can manufacture in a week and M represent the number of medium size rugs that the company can manufacture in a week. Which of the following statements best explains whether the company will be able to make 12 small size rugs and 5 medium size rugs in a week? The company will not be able to make these numbers in a week because of the system restrictions of 2S + 3M ≤ 40 and 4S + 6M ≤ 50. The company will be able to make these numbers in a week because of the system restrictions of 2S + 4S ≤ 40 and 3M + 6M ≤ 50. The company will be able to make these numbers in a week because of the system restrictions of 4S + 3M ≤ 40 and 2S + 6M ≤ 50. The company will not be able to make these numbers in a week because of the system restrictions of 2S + 3S ≤ 40 and 4M + 6M ≤ 50.
A small size rug requires 2 hours for dyeing A medium size rug requires 3 hours for dyeing Give a "name" to the number of small rugs. Call it S similarly call the number of medium rugs M how many hours does it take to dye S small rugs? any idea ?
10 hours
how did you get 10 ?
I thought i said 5 not S s and 5 look the same on my screen
so you did 2*5 ? that is the right idea. except use S instead of 5 multiply a number times a letter is easy. you just write down 2*S (or in algebra where we leave out the multiply sign) : 2S
A medium size rug requires 3 hours for dyeing call the number of medium rugs M how many hours does it take to dye M medium rugs?
3 hours
per medium rug. But you have "M" of these rugs
remember M is an (unknown) number.
Ok
if you knew the number you know what to do to find the total number of hours? what would you do ?
A medium size rug requires 3 hours for dyeing if you had 2 medium rugs, how long to dye both of them?
6
now here is the idea: the number 6 is not the important thing. What is important is how did you get the 6. what did you do to find 6? you did 3 hours per rug times number of rugs that is the idea: 3 * # of rugs and if we have the number of rugs= M how long to dye M medium rugs?
idk 3
the idea: 3 * # of rugs Do you get the idea that "M" is the number of rugs ? We can give names to numbers for example if you had a dozen rugs and it takes 3 hours to dye each rug it will take 3 * dozen hours dozen is just a name. But we can use M as a name.
So the answer is C
im just doin process of elimintion
Do you have time to learn how to do this? It will take some time.
Yea i have the time
so let's see if this part makes sense: It takes 3 hours to dye a rug. To find how long it takes to dye 1, 2 or 3 rugs: It takes 1*3 hours to dye 1 rug It takes 2*3 hours to dye 2 rugs It takes 3*3 hours to dye 3 rugs
K
do you see a pattern?
1*3 2*3 3*3 how long to dye 4 rugs? 4*3 notice we do not have to multiply it out to get a number. we just write 4*3
Yea
now don't multiply it out, just write it down. How long to dye 5 rugs?
5
i mean it takes 3
we have a pattern: 1*3 2*3 3*3 4*3 the pattern will be the same for 5 rugs. try again
5*3
now think about that. you wrote 5*3 that means 5 rugs will take 5*3 hours if we simplify that we get 15 hours does that seem right?
yea because it is the same patteren for the rest of the rugs
yes, it is correct.
how long to dye 6 rugs? (don't multiply it out, just write it down)
Wrote it
write it here
oh 6*3
we have a pattern: 1*3 2*3 3*3 4*3 5*3 6*3 what about 7 rugs?
7*3
now, what if we use a letter instead of a number? say we have M rugs we follow the pattern how many hours for M rugs?
m*3
yes. Now that is the main idea. The pattern is the same whether we use numbers or letters.
we use that pattern to answer this: A medium size rug requires 3 hours for dyeing call the number of medium rugs M how many hours does it take to dye M medium rugs?
M*3
yes. does this make any sense?
can you answer this question A small size rug requires 2 hours for dyeing you have S small rugs how long to dye S small rugs?
S*2
exactly
now how long does it take to dye both the small rugs and the medium rugs? we write down the sum. can you do that?
So you want me to put S * 2 = M * 3
almost. but they are not equal we want to add them together. The best we can do is put a + sign between them (which means "add together")
S * 2 + M * 3
Like that
yes. that is the total number of hours to dye the small and medium rugs
it is the "math" way to say the sum of hours for the small rugs and the medium rugs
dyeing unit cannot work for more than 40 hours in a week, that means the sum (i.e. S * 2 + M * 3 ) must be less than or equal to 40 can you write that use ≤ ?
<
:P
S * 2 < M * 3
less than or equal uses ≤ less than uses < hours ≤ 40
not S * 2 < M * 3 we worked hard to write down the sum of the hours as S*2 + M*3 think of that as a thing (it is a thing, it is the sum of the hours it takes to dye the rugs) and we know that the sum must be less than or equal to 40
Ok
we say the hours to dye the rugs is less than or equal to 40 now write that in "math" the hours to dye the rugs is S*2 + M*3 less than or equal is ≤ 40 is 40 can you write it out in "math"?
Umm lol not really
math is a "short-hand" way to write the English. replace the words with the "short version" in other words, use the hours to dye the rugs is S*2 + M*3 less than or equal is ≤ 40 is 40 to replace the words in hours to dye the rugs is less than or equal to 40
example: number of people is less than 40 long version short version number of people is X is less than is ≤ 40 is 40 using the short version, we write X ≤ 40
long version short version the hours to dye the rugs is S*2 + M*3 is less than is ≤ 40 is 40
O ok
give it a try
40 < S * 2 + M * 3
almost. that says that the hours to dye is more than 40 the "bigger" side is next to the bigger side of < we want the hours to be less than 40
40 > S * 2 + M * 3
yes. but we should tweak that. we want hours is less than OR EQUAL we should write it 40 ≥ S * 2 + M * 3 or 40 >= S * 2 + M * 3
also, we can put the S * 2 + M * 3 first (as along as we write the 40 next to thebigger side of >) in other words, we can also write S * 2 + M * 3 ≤ 40
remember in algebra we usually don't write the multiply sign, and we usually put letters after numbers (don't have to, but it is a habit people use) so S * 2 + M * 3 ≤ 40 can be written as 2S + 3M ≤ 40 The answer must have this relation in it.
can you find any choices with that relation?
A
yes, and the other choices do not. so A is the only possible choice.
^~^ thx soooo MUCH for your time to help me out phi
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!