Double integrals: given trapezoid corner points (1,0),(2,0),(0,-2) and (0,-1) and have to use these to find my boundaries for the double integral of exp((x+y)/(x-y) dA. I know that x can be between 0 to 2. Same for y. But that would be the wrong area. So not sure what integral boundaries to use here...
it looks like they expect you to use a change of variables. notice u= x+y will be parallel to the line connecting (0,-1) to (1,0) ditto (0,-2) and (2,0)
yes, I noticed that. But wasn't sure what to do with it
Still not sure now :-)
so I have to use another set of variables instead of x and y. The integrals of the function in there is a pain. But the sphere variables don't apply.
u= x+y simplifies things I am wonder what's a good choice for v
it looks like v= x-y is what you want to do you now need the Jacobian, and the new limits.
Ok, I'll work out the Jacobian
so I have \[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1\end{matrix}\right]\]
and you want the determinate of that
Which is -2, and I'll have to use the absolute, so that makes 2
So now I have \[\int\limits_{}^{}\int\limits_{K}^{}2dudv\]
my notes say du dv = |J| dx dy so dx dy = 1/|J| du dv
|dw:1409064337227:dw| Trying to figure out where to draw the v axis
You are correct. The roles of the u,v and x,y are reversed here in contrast to those of my course
the v axis is perpendicular to the u
That would make for the limits for u:-2,2 and for v:0,2?
Let's first clear up a detail. I originally said u= x+y but the line connecting (0,-1) to (1,0) which has slope 1 in other words, we want u to be parallel to the line y=x or y-x=0 so let u = y-x and v= x+y
Is it ok if I just do u=x+y and v=y-x?
ok, but then you have to relabel your picture
Isn't the one I drew x+y?
no, that is the mistake I made. the line we want must have positive slope (= +1) based on change in y / change in x the line x+y=0 --> y=-x (with y intercept of 0) has the wrong slope y-x=0 --> y=x (with y intercept of 0) has the correct slope
Yeah, you're right, just checked with the slope for myself. And the perpendicular one would be y=-x => y+x
Ok then I'll have u=y-x and v=x+y
and the Jocobian is still the same
yup
But my chosen limits are correct no?
When I use -2<u<2 and 0<v<2 for my limits I find as a solution 4 for the double integral
u goes from x=0 (the starting left leg) to y=0 (the right leg) of the figure we need to find x and y in terms of u and v
So u has (0,0) as limits?
v would have (1,2)
the limits of u will be a function of v u= y -x v= y+x u+v = 2y or y= (u+v)/2 also v-u = 2x x = (v-u)/2
|dw:1409065666796:dw| I based my limits just based on the drawing
If I use the equations you put forward for let's v=1 and y=0 then u=-1 let's v=2 and y=0 then u=-2
Well I think I've unconfused myself if we use u= y-x and v= y+x then that means the constant level curves for u are |dw:1409066322510:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!