Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

does the following set form a vector space?

OpenStudy (somy):

yes it does since they are linearly independant

OpenStudy (anonymous):

which one?

OpenStudy (somy):

a) is a vector space

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

a set of linear independent vectors does not form a vector space always

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep, I do agrre and also second one is not but how?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

i.e. {<1,1>, <2,2>} is a set of linear independent vectors but is not a space.

OpenStudy (somy):

i think 2nd one is not because there is a domain for which c1 or c2 does not exist due to the sqrt

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

errr {<1,1>, <2,3>} is a set of linear independent vectors but is not a space.

OpenStudy (somy):

haha ya i was thinking about that

OpenStudy (somy):

wait how come its not a vector space?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how do I prove it?

OpenStudy (somy):

do u mean like its a vector space only if its c1(v1)+c2(v2)

OpenStudy (somy):

where v1 and v2 are linearly independant

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

so take two vectors of the form \(c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>\) like \(c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>\) and \(c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>\) and add them \(c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>+c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>= <c_1,c_2>+<c_3,c_4>=\\(c_1+c_3)<1,0>+(c_2+c_4)<0,1>\) Since \(c,_1,c_2,c_3,c_4 \in \mathbb{R}\) we have that \(c_1+c_3,c_2+c_4 \in \mathbb{R}\) so \((c_1+c_3)<1,0>+(c_2+c_4)<0,1>\in A\) Where I am calling A the set in a)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

so we are closed with respect to vector addition right>

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

note we need only show its a subset of \(\mathbb{R}^2\) because \(\mathbb{R}^2\) is surely a vectorspace

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes it passes vector addition properties now what about scalar multiplication and zro vector

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

you can easily just throw in scalars on my last proof to show scalar closure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and zero vector? is it even in there?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

of course \(c_1=0, c_2=0\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ahhh, i see. So c1 + c2 can be anything....this concept is confusing and also makes sense at the same time

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

for scalar \(\alpha (c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>)+\beta(c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>)= <\alpha c_1,\beta c_2>+<\alpha c_3,\beta c_4>=\\\alpha(c_1+c_3)<1,0>+\beta(c_2+c_4)<0,1>\) where \(\alpha,\beta\) are in some field \(F\)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

that shows both closure of addition and multiplication

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

because again \(\alpha(c_1+c_3),\beta(c_2+c_4)\in \mathbb{R}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

makes sense completely. Thanks a lot

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what about part b

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

that should say \(\alpha (c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>)+\beta(c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>)= \\<\alpha c_1,\alpha c_2>+<\beta c_3,\beta c_4>=(\alpha c_1 + \beta c_3) <1,0>+(\alpha c_2+\beta c_4)<0,1>\)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

um

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

sec

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

2 is not because \(<1,0>\) is in the set, but \(<1,0>+<1,0>=<2,0>=2<1,0>+0<0,1>\notin A\)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

it is not closed wrt vector addtion

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sweet, thank you soooo much

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

because \(2+0\ne 1\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

haha ya i figured tht

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

or \(2^2+0^2 = 4 \ne 1\)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

ok gl, must sleep.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

haha sleep is not for math and science major good joke tho

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

starting my phd in 2 weeks, and I have only been graduated for 2 weeks... I get sleep now:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

congrats and good luck friend

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

tnx ttys im sure:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep me too :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks for all help

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!