does the following set form a vector space?
yes it does since they are linearly independant
which one?
a) is a vector space
a set of linear independent vectors does not form a vector space always
yep, I do agrre and also second one is not but how?
i.e. {<1,1>, <2,2>} is a set of linear independent vectors but is not a space.
i think 2nd one is not because there is a domain for which c1 or c2 does not exist due to the sqrt
errr {<1,1>, <2,3>} is a set of linear independent vectors but is not a space.
haha ya i was thinking about that
wait how come its not a vector space?
how do I prove it?
do u mean like its a vector space only if its c1(v1)+c2(v2)
where v1 and v2 are linearly independant
so take two vectors of the form \(c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>\) like \(c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>\) and \(c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>\) and add them \(c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>+c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>= <c_1,c_2>+<c_3,c_4>=\\(c_1+c_3)<1,0>+(c_2+c_4)<0,1>\) Since \(c,_1,c_2,c_3,c_4 \in \mathbb{R}\) we have that \(c_1+c_3,c_2+c_4 \in \mathbb{R}\) so \((c_1+c_3)<1,0>+(c_2+c_4)<0,1>\in A\) Where I am calling A the set in a)
so we are closed with respect to vector addition right>
note we need only show its a subset of \(\mathbb{R}^2\) because \(\mathbb{R}^2\) is surely a vectorspace
yes it passes vector addition properties now what about scalar multiplication and zro vector
you can easily just throw in scalars on my last proof to show scalar closure
and zero vector? is it even in there?
of course \(c_1=0, c_2=0\)
ahhh, i see. So c1 + c2 can be anything....this concept is confusing and also makes sense at the same time
for scalar \(\alpha (c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>)+\beta(c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>)= <\alpha c_1,\beta c_2>+<\alpha c_3,\beta c_4>=\\\alpha(c_1+c_3)<1,0>+\beta(c_2+c_4)<0,1>\) where \(\alpha,\beta\) are in some field \(F\)
that shows both closure of addition and multiplication
because again \(\alpha(c_1+c_3),\beta(c_2+c_4)\in \mathbb{R}\)
makes sense completely. Thanks a lot
what about part b
that should say \(\alpha (c_1<1,0>+c_2<0,1>)+\beta(c_3<1,0>+c_4<0,1>)= \\<\alpha c_1,\alpha c_2>+<\beta c_3,\beta c_4>=(\alpha c_1 + \beta c_3) <1,0>+(\alpha c_2+\beta c_4)<0,1>\)
um
sec
2 is not because \(<1,0>\) is in the set, but \(<1,0>+<1,0>=<2,0>=2<1,0>+0<0,1>\notin A\)
it is not closed wrt vector addtion
sweet, thank you soooo much
because \(2+0\ne 1\)
haha ya i figured tht
or \(2^2+0^2 = 4 \ne 1\)
ok gl, must sleep.
haha sleep is not for math and science major good joke tho
starting my phd in 2 weeks, and I have only been graduated for 2 weeks... I get sleep now:)
congrats and good luck friend
tnx ttys im sure:)
yep me too :)
thanks for all help
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!