is the empty set really a set? prove...
An empty set is a weird concept. Imagine we had a set, called A and it had no elements. Since the items in that set (nothing) are still in that set, then it is a subset of A. Easy way to think about is that since we cannot find any element in subset A, then all the elements in the empty subset is in Subset A.
I don't know a mathematical way of proving it. maybe @iambatman knows how
Or @arabpride
Good question. Not positive, but I believe the name fits the concept quite well, because, although it may not contain any elements, it is still considered a set. I really don't think that answered your question but... I tired cx
see it like this , a set is like a box if the box is empty or not it will still a box right /? same with set it doesnt matter if its empty or non its a set like a box
There is no mathematical equation as such to prove it. It is a mixture of common and mathematical knowledge
\[\large \phi = \{\}\]
^^ That is the symbol of an empty set, rather than typing {}
\[\large \phi = \{\} \approx \square \]
yeah somewhat close to a box :P
lol. It is a box if you have my drawing skills ;)
ganesh copy cut :P \(\large \emptyset\)
whats the actual correct symbol for empty set ? \(\large \phi, \Phi, 0, \emptyset\)
\[\emptyset \]
even says empty set xD
The most accepted one is either the second or last symbol, but I am sure the others will be acceptable also.
Oh yeah `\emptyset` says it all :)
also there is another one mmm
|dw:1410081634557:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!