Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
For all integers n,
\[n^3-n\] is divisible by 3.
How to show this?
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
what did you try so far?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I know that I can use induction method but not sure how to apply it yet so i've been trying to manipulate it to prove it by that method
OpenStudy (loser66):
Hint: factor n out, simplify to get the logic
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[n(n^2-1)\]
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
This is what i tried also but not sure how that helps me?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
to show it is divisible by 3
OpenStudy (loser66):
more
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
n(n-1)(n+1)
OpenStudy (loser66):
Yup
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Would I then try to get a 1/3 out?
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
Actually this not true for any integer?
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
you can try out some integers
OpenStudy (anonymous):
\[(2)(2-1)(2+1) = 2(1)(3)\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
So i should set the condition: \[n \ge 1\]
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
you goal is to prove that n(n-1)(n+1)=3k
that is what it means to be divisible by 3
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
what about negative intergers?
what did the original problem state
OpenStudy (anonymous):
for every positive integer is only thing that was stated
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
okay good
you stated for any integer n, which made think that there must be a problem
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
if it is positive integers that's good!
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
But when we use 1 there is a zero ? \[(1)(0)(2) = 0\]
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
well 0 divisible by any number we get back 0
OpenStudy (anonymous):
True so then k is also zero
OpenStudy (loser66):
hey, Positive integer means >0 (strictly )
OpenStudy (loser66):
Non-negative is \(\geq \)0
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
eh good catch @Loser66 zero is not included
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
my bad!
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so zero if zero is not included there must still be a problem?
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
what problem?
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
no you got me wrong! i meant not included in positive integers
but 0 is still divisible by 3
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Ohhhh okay I see now so by expanding my original expression and plugging in positive integers I showed that it is divisible by 3 but how would i know to add the "3k" to the right of my expression for next time?
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
not sure i got you point here hehe
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
i was replying to @Johnbc
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
yes those consecutive
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
No worries
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
eh i have to go lol
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Thank you very much I am still unsure about the right side but I understand the left
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
good luck with this^_^
@Loser66 gave you a hint to go with this
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Plugging in P(n)?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Thank you
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):
you can easily see for n=3 as he showed
but you need to do it for n and n+1