Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not? Loyalists believed the British government protected their rights, but Patriots disagreed. Loyalists usually had close personal ties to Great Britain, but Patriots did not. Patriots argued that citizens must give up freedoms to ensure security, but Loyalists disagreed. Patriots were well educated about political and economic ideas, but Loyalists were not.
hey are you doing flvs world history?
Yes
Y?
maybe I can help you, what test is this, oh and 8th right
Yes 8th Gradee & 02.05 Revolutionary Celebrities
The answer is A, I got it right :)
Thanks
no prob
Taxation without representation is tyranny. Why did James Otis make this statement? He believed that America's representatives in Parliament were corrupt. He was a Loyalist who supported British taxes after the war with France. He believed American colonists should be able to vote in Parliament. He was the head of the Massachusetts Committee of Correspondence.
Did Yu GEt THis One?
hold on
yea its not D lol, wait a sec
I Think Its The 3rd One
Question Information: Some people say tyranny; other people say cruel and unfair. James Otis believed it was unfair for the colonists to pay taxes to a government if they weren't allowed to vote. I think its c too
It Was C
u submitted it yea!!!! did u get a 100%
I Just Got One Wrong What was one reason that Patriots were more willing to go to war with Britain than the Loyalists? Loyalists believed Great Britain safeguarded their religious rights in the colonies. Loyalists believed American representatives in Parliament were corrupt. Patriots had closer political and business ties to transatlantic trade with Great Britain. Patriots were more likely than Loyalists to believe in the idea of consent of the governed I Chose A
it was D ^
Ehh I Shld Of Asked Lol
yea lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!