Question

Which of the following does NOT describe a scientific law?

A. Explains how and why nature does what it does.
B. Based on experimental evidence and has withstood the test of time
C. Tells us what nature will do under certain circumstances.

Answer 1

A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describes some aspect of the universe. A scientific law always applies under the same conditions, and implies that there is a causal relationship involving its elements.

Based on this definition from Google, I would say the answer is A. A scientific law is never 100% certain therefore it would never be able to explain "how and why nature does what it does" definitely