how do i determine the infinite limit of: lim x->3+ f(x)=ln(x^2-9)
its limit does not exist
hes talking from the positive direction i think
ln(0) = negative infinity
can you explain why it does not exist?
the x->3+ means the right side correct?
yes
how did you get ln(0)?
im thinking something like if x>3 since its approaching from the positive side and x^2-9 3.000001^2-9 = some positive number infinitely close to 0. if we were coming from the negative side x<3 2.999999^2-9=some negative number infinitely close to 0.
however the vertical asymptotes are at -3 and 3
because you factored it out right
so x cannot equal 3 or -3
correct, but approaching from the positive side it goes to negative infinity, im trying to figure out how to word this right..
ok wait so i was told that if lim x->a- f(x) does not equal to lim x->a+ f(x) then the limit does not exist in other words if the left side and right side are not the same then the limit does not exist
true
i think the ln is just throwing me off in this one
x^2+9 has to be greater then or equal to 0 ln(x)=y e^y=x x has to be greater then 0
x^2+9 nvm cant be equal to
but it can be infintely close (approaching 3)
but it never reaches it right?
no, but it could be 0.000......1 if you tried approaching from the negative side you would have a negative number close to 0. but it has to be greater then 0, so it can only approach from the positive side
i had a quick question you do not plug in the 3 into the equation right? because i know there are some limits that you do to try and find what type it is
so would the answer be +infinity or no?
i never plugged in 3, just thinking conceptually. try graphing it, you will see the asymptotes and it goes down. with ln(x), x cannot be less then 0 instead were saying ln(x^2-9) when x approaches 3 from the positive side its sum number greater then 3 but really close to 3. like 3.00000000000001^2-9 3.0000000001^2-9=some positive number really close to 0 for ln(x), as x approaches 0 from the positive side it goes to negative infinity
oh ok so you know the limit laws? those are used for other types of limits?
im taking the same class as you calc 1 right? sept im like a week ahead i think...so im no expert on this
yea its called math 2a(calc) here i have a quiz tomorrow in discussion
id have to work on this for 40 minutes to give a clearer answer
what book are you using for your class? wonder if its the same
its the schools custom book. same material probably
oh we are using the Stewart's Early Transcendentals 7th ed
i dont think there are any limit laws in play here since the limit DNE. it only exists when approaching from the positive side.
we are on section 2.6 but are getting quizzed on 2.2. and 2.3
oh ok
like theres some where you have to calculate whether the limit is infinite or not and then it has to do with the numerator and denominator idk if that applies here
\[(3^-)^2 < 9 \] \[(3^+)^2 > 9 \] dont think theres any num/denom stuff here
@SithsAndGiggles
ok so are possible answer choices infinity, -infinity, or DNE ? for these type of probs
this one is DNE right?
if the question is\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 3^{+}} \ln(x^2-9)=-oo\] \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 3^{-}} \ln(x^2-9)=DNE\] \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 3} \ln(x^2-9)=DNE\]
and thats because the domain is (-oo,-3]U[3,oo)
ohhhh ok now i see what you're saying
so it doesnt exist
so since it asked for the right side x->3+ then as it get closer to 0 then it is going in the direction of -infinity? or am i misunderstanding still?
yes
the limit DNE, but the limit from the positive side is at negative infinity
since the section your on is limits at infinity im assuming the answer is gonna be either negative or positive infinity.
ok so why isn't the other on x->3- at positive infinity?
because of the domain restriction
the function would go to positive infinity as x goes to positive or negative infinity
do you know what the graph looks like?
there are two V.A right?
ya
oh cool thanks
thatzz what i said loll
ok its like going downward
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!