Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 24 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

In what ways do Alexander’s actions demonstrates his own knowledge of history as well as a capacity to apply that knowledge to his own circumstances? How did this make him a successful leader and king?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Just looking for ideas so I can tighten up my essay.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Another anecdote paints a more troubling picture of Alexander. Once, in offering a sacrifice, Alexander scooped up two whole handfuls of incense and tossed them into the altar-fire. His tutor, Leonidas, rebuked him, reportedly saying, "When you've conquered the spice-bearing regions, you can throw away all the incense you like. Till then, don't waste it." Years later, Alexander would capture Gaza, a major spice producer. Along with the usual gifts for his mother and sister, he included a consignment of eighteen tons of frankincense and myrrh for the old tutor Leonidas–the resale of which would have made him exorbitantly rich. This was delivered "in remembrance of the hope with which that teacher had inspired his boyhood," along with a warning to cease being stingy to the gods. On the one hand, Alexander's actions demonstrate considerable generosity, if in a mocking manner. However, this anecdote also reveals Alexander's capacity for holding grudges; he is known for never forgetting an injury. Though he waited with patience, he rarely failed in the end to carry out his vengeance.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay....that is interesting, thank you. :D (Alexander the Great is awesome. Honestly, why'd is soldiers have to poison him? :shakesheadexasperatedly: it's not like he was pushing them to the point of exhaustion or whatever, oh...wait....) I don't think it really satisfies the essay requirements though. It's more like...oh, the Persian's were weak in that respect in that war? Let me exploit that now...sort of thing. :shrug:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

n the positive column we could start with young and intelligent; Alexander brought a fresh approach after the intrigues of his father Philip II. Alexander was not quite twenty when he succeeded to the throne in 336 BCE. His tutor had been Aristotle, a man to whom is credited great knowledge and wisdom. So it could be said that Alexander was well-grounded educationally, this thirst for knowledge continued as his campaigns were sometimes more like expeditions as individuals made notes as they moved east.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's true...sorry it took me so long to respond, working on my second essay I rather doubt it was thirst for knowledge that drove him though, more thirst for land and revenge. Not to mention the adrenaline from battle rage, given his personality, I would think Alexander found fighting to be a bit...addicting.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!