Find the fundamental matrix of the linear system x'=Ax where A is the 3x3 matrix [{1,1,0},{0,1,1},{0,0,1}. I know I should use the Putzer's Method but I keep getting stuck
Finding the fundamental matrix is a matter of computing the eigenvalues and -vectors for the given matrix. Solve for all \(\lambda\): \[\begin{vmatrix} 1-\lambda&1&0\\ 0&1-\lambda&1\\ 0&0&1-\lambda \end{vmatrix}=0\]
To get you started... With a cofactor expansion along the first column, you'll find the determinant to be \[\begin{vmatrix} \color{red}{1-\lambda}&1&0\\ \color{red}0&1-\lambda&1\\ \color{red}0&0&1-\lambda \end{vmatrix}=\color{red}{(1-\lambda)}\begin{vmatrix}1-\lambda&1\\0&1-\lambda\end{vmatrix}-\color{red}0+\color{red}0=(1-\lambda)^3\]
right. I found that, but I was told to use the Putzer method since all of the eigenvalues are the same and will give the same eigenvectors
I'm not familiar with the Putzer method, at least not by name, but to deal with repeated eigenvalues, the way I learned to do it was by finding the eigenvalues \(\vec{\eta}_i\) that satisfy \[(A-\lambda I)~\vec{\eta}_1=\vec{0}\\ (A-\lambda I)^2~\vec{\eta}_2=\vec{0}\\ (A-\lambda I)^3~\vec{\eta}_3=\vec{0}\] and I vaguely recall that you should get the same result if you do the following: \[(A-\lambda I)~\vec{\eta}_1=\vec{0}\\ (A-\lambda I)~\vec{\eta}_2=\vec{\eta}_1\\ (A-\lambda I)~\vec{\eta}_3=\vec{\eta}_2\] but I might be mistaken about that...
hmmm I've never seen that but if it will help me solve the question I will try it. So am I trying to find when that matrix times the eigenvalue n will give 0 or is it when the determinant of that matrix times the eigenvalue is zero?
You're multiplying matrices, not determinants. So the first eigenvalue can be found as follows: \[(A-I)~\vec{\eta}_1=\vec{0}~~\iff~~\begin{pmatrix}0&1&0\\0&0&1\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\eta_{1,1}\\\eta_{1,2}\\\eta_{1,3}\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}\] for which you'll find that \(\eta_{1,1}\) can take on any number. For simplicity, we'd let \(\eta_{1,1}=1\), so the first eigenvector would be \[\vec{\eta}_1=\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}\]
this looks pretty similar to the putzer method. just different letters. I got stuck trying to figure out what n1, n2, and n3. I got n1=t^2/2(e^t)+1 n2=te^t snf n3=e^t-1 but I feel like these are wrong.
By "n1,n2,n3", if you mean \(\vec{\eta}_1,~\vec{\eta}_2,~\vec{\eta}_3\), you should be getting vectors with constant entries... I'm not sure what you're saying you're getting. \[\begin{cases}(A-\lambda I)~\vec{\eta}_1=\vec{0}&(1)\\ (A-\lambda I)~\vec{\eta}_2=\vec{\eta}_1&(2)\\ (A-\lambda I)~\vec{\eta}_3=\vec{\eta}_2&(3)\end{cases}\] We already solved (1), so sub that into (2) to find \(\vec{\eta}_2\). \[\begin{pmatrix}0&1&0\\0&0&1\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}\eta_{2,1}\\\eta_{2,2}\\\eta_{2,3}\end{pmatrix} =\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}\] which gives \(\eta_{2,2}=1\) and \(\eta_{2,3}=0\), while \(\eta_{2,1}\) can take on any real number. Again, for simplicity, we can set \(\eta_{2,1}=1\), so the second eigenvector would be \[\vec{\eta}_2=\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\\0\end{pmatrix}\]
oh i see where I messed up!!! thank you so much!!!
You're welcome!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!