Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 27 Online
OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Find a power seriesssss

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

For x^x and radius of convergence XD @ganeshie8

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what is the definition of \(x^x\) ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Hint : \[e^{x\ln x}\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[x^x = e^{xlnx} = \sum \frac{ (xlnx)^n }{ n! }\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

This?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

that looks good ! for radius of convergence try ur fav convergence test : ratio test ?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Really it's that easy..wow. Yeah I'll try that right now

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

power of power series !

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

do u really need to use a test ?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I got infinity lol i messed up I think

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

you know that it converges to x^x no matter what the value of x is, so..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There are issues with \(e^{x\ln(x)}\) that don't exist with \(x^x\) when \(x\geq 0\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, there is an issue with \(0\) in either case, but not for negative \(x\).

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

we let 0^0 = 1

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

atleast while working with series i think..

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

It is infinity yeah :D

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

wait a sec, what we got over there is not really a power series as the coefficients are function of x right ?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I guess

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

you can fix that by plugging in power seroes of lnx over there but then u need to shift the center too hmm

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

it may not be correct to call it a power series, but its okay to call it infinnite series expansion @wio what do u think

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Power series must be in the form of: \[ \sum c_n(x-a)^n \]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Exactly ^

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Yeah the power series converges for all x

OpenStudy (anonymous):

In this case \(a=0\) and \(c_n = [\ln(x)]^n / n!\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is it allowed for that \(x\) to be there? I am not so sure.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

we dont want x terms in coefficient right ?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Using ratio test I got 0 which means for it converges everywhere so it's infinite xD

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

if it is allowed, we are okays yeah

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I think it is allowed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm pretty sure that \(x\) can't be in the coefficient. \(c_n\) is supposed to be a constant; allowing \(c_n\) to contain \(x\) turns it into a function.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Also, if we're to find a Taylor expansion for \(x^x\), it would make more sense to find it about the point \(x=1\) (not \(x=0\) since \(x^x\) and it's derivatives aren't defined when \(x=0\)).

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yeah it wont be a polynomial anymore if we allow x's in coeffiecient function

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

agree we need to center the taylor expansion at x=1 not sure why wolfram is fooling us http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=power+series+x%5Ex

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!