Ask your own question, for FREE!
Algebra 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

From uniform convergence. anyone please help.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (zarkon):

the Weierstrass function function ic.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm???

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Zarkon..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe this is a step in the right direction? For the series to be uniformly convergent, you must have for any \(\epsilon>0\) and \(x\) in the domain some \(N\) such that \[\large\left|S_p(x)-S_r(x)\right|<\epsilon\] where \(S_k(x)\) denotes the \(k\)th partial sum. You have \[\large\begin{align*}\left|\sum_{n=1}^pb^n\cos(a^n\pi x)-\sum_{n=1}^rb^n\cos(a^n\pi x)\right|&=\left|\sum_{n=r+1}^pb^n\cos(a^n\pi x)\right|\\\\ &\le\sum_{n=r+1}^p\left|b^n\cos(a^n\pi x)\right|\\\\ &=\sum_{n=r+1}^pb^n\left|\cos(a^n\pi x)\right|\\\\ &\le\sum_{n=r+1}^pb^n\\\\ &=\frac{b\left(b^n-b^m\right)}{b-1}<\epsilon \end{align*}\] so you know that whatever \(N\) you end up choosing, it will be independent of \(x\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That last line should read \[\large\frac{b(b^p-b^r)}{b-1}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh and there's slight error in the definition I wrote above for uniform convergence. It should say for any \(\epsilon\) there exists \(N\) for all \(x\), etc. (The order matters, I believe...)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@SithsAndGiggles Cauchy's criterion??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Am I remembering things incorrectly? Sorry, it's been a while since I've taken a course in real analysis.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!