Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

Question about Darbaux Sums. I beg of ya, take a look for me.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

So I feel like my answer must be wrong because it is too easy. I need the lower Darbaux sum for x^3 with partitions {0, .1, .4, 1}.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

so, the \(m_i\) for the first partition would be 0, then .001 then .064, that's it?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

but shouldn't there be 4?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

@jim_thompson5910, @zepdrix, any ideas?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

@dumbcow , I can't remember, have you covered this yet?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

@ganeshie8 be my hero?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

hey how is it different from riemann sum ?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

it's the precursor to riemann. It's essentially the "left handed" sum from calc II, but Maybe it's just the class throwing me off here

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

technically it is defined as:\[L(P,f)=\sum^n_{i=1} m_i\Delta x_i\]\[m_i=inf~[f(x):x_{i-1}\le x\le x_i]\]

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

i can tell you the reason there are 3 m values is because with 4 points there are 3 intervals {x0,x1} [x1,x2] [x2,x3]

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

oh jeeze, yea, that makes sense

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

I can show you my work, the issue is I don't fully understand what the m_i are equal to.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

m_i = inf M_i = sup in the ith interval

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

i got, m_i= 0,.001,.064

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

Hey I got the right answer!!!!

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

so I must have done it correctly! :D Thanks guys!

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

idk we both may be wrong, but based on the definition of sum it looks same as riemann sum for x^3 because min and max exist in each interval and they equal inf and sup

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

the def of riemann int has the upper and lower darbaux int. being equivalent, so maybe that is what it is

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

ohk.. do u get this for upper sum ? http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%280.1-0%29*0.1%5E3%2B%280.4-0.1%29*0.4%5E3+%2B+%281-0.4%29*1%5E3

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

wait, I haven't done it yet

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

give me a sec

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Okay... i think there will be difference between riemann and darbaux when the curve is concave up or down. When that happens, the left and right values will not be inf and sup respectively always

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

I got .6193 for the upper

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

i got the same!

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

yay! Thanks, I was just doubting myself since it seemed so simple

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!