Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

Homework check! Can you please see if my proof is 1 rigorous enough, and 2 correct. Thanks!!! Prove: If \[f\in R[a,b]\] and \[[c,d]\subset [a,b]\] then the restriction \[f|_{[c,d]}\] is in R[c,d].

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

WLOG assume c<d. Then we have a<c<d<b. Since [c,d] is contained in [a,b]. by thm 5.2.2

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

We know that if \[f\in R[a,b]\] then for every e is an element of [a,b] \[\int_a^b f=\int_a^ef+\int_e^bf\]

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

which means f must be riemann integrable on [a,e] and [e,b]. So now we can write

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

\[\int_a^bf=\int_a^cf+\int_c^df+\int_d^bf\] by thm 5.2.2, this means f must be riemann int on [a,c] [c,d] and [d,b] in order for \[f\in R[a,b]\]** The restriction means our domain is [c,d] for f. Therefore by ** [c,d] is riemann int.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

end pf

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

thm 5.2.2 is essentially what I stated with the a<e<b interval up top

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

i have no clue about restrictions @ikram002p @ChristopherToni

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

restriction just means evaluate f on whatever interval they restrict it to

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

ie the domain is only [c,d] here

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

@eliassaab , can you check?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

@aum @zepdrix

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

@zzr0ck3r is online

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

what is R[a,b] and what is theorem 5. what ever

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

Riemann set essentially riemann integrable and the thm is in a second comment below

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

http://www.jirka.org/ra/realanal.pdf page157

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

looks fine.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

does it need anything, is there anything that needs elaborated on?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

needs some dx's :)

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

lol, yea, we don't use those in this class "in order to leave the variable of integration open"

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

prob a good idea:)

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

thanks, I keep getting nailed on points because my proofs are not rigorous enough.

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

I don't see what else you could add to it.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

yea.. tell me about it, but with how this class is going I'll still get docked somewhere

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

thanks for looking at it :)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

for sure!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!