Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 21 Online
myininaya (myininaya):

Pretend we have f(x)=a|x| for some value a. Then f'(x)=a|x|/x what is f'(0) if a=0? Multiple Choice. A) f'(0) doesn't exist because 0*|0|/0 is undefined. B) f'(0)=0 because f(x)=0 when a=0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

B. It would only be undefined if x=0. Because 0 would be in the denominator. But since a=0, we know that anything multiplied by 0 is also 0, and anything divided by 0 is 0. So yes, B is the answer.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

You have to piecewise define the derivative, see if left and right limits are equal

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sorry, I read it wrong, it is undefined

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

Not really since f'(x)=a|x|/x gives both right and left derivative

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

I'm more inclined to f'(0)=0 since a=0 implies that f(x)=0 for any x

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

you have to define it for x>0 and x<0, the function doesn't exist at zero (0/0) so you need to see if the limit exists

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

for any a, then pick the subcase

myininaya (myininaya):

What I think maybe is if f(x)=ag(x) then f'(x)=ag'(x) doesn't matter if a=0 if a=0 then f(x)=0*g(x)=0 <--but I'm kinda worried about saying f(x)=0 for all x if a=0 since g'(x) might have some restrictions due to the curve of y=g(x)

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

the function exists for zero, but the limit doesn't exist at zero (correction to your statement)

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

if a =0 then you do have a trivial solution

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

well if a=0 doesn't this allow us to say f(x)=0 for any x?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

the derivaative doesn't here, the initial fn yes, oops

myininaya (myininaya):

you know what I'm pretty sure since f(x) does exist for all x then f(x)=a|x|=0|x|=0 for all x therefore f'(x)=0 for all x

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

that is the trivial solution, yes. But don't you have to show work?

myininaya (myininaya):

that is the work

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hmm good argument

myininaya (myininaya):

also i made up this question

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

meh, ok

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

hehe! you made it up. interesting!

myininaya (myininaya):

now if a was some other value then we would have f(x)=a|x| then f'(x)=a|x|/x and if a doesn't equal 0 then f'(0) doesn't exist

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

the question is, does it exist for any other a though?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

how are they getting that derivative value?

myininaya (myininaya):

The derivative of |x| is |x|/x

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

I would have just piecewise defined it... it's easier to see the reason the deriv doesn't exist

myininaya (myininaya):

|x|/x doesn't exist when x=0

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

True, for any a f'(0) doesn't exist

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

Oh, I don't consider that the derivative, I guess that's why.

myininaya (myininaya):

@xapproachesinfinity I did ask the question because I have seen similar questions asked on OS.

myininaya (myininaya):

@FibonacciChick666 there is nothing wrong with writing it as a piecewise function

myininaya (myininaya):

both ways look pretty

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

they are the same in the end, but then it is easier to confuse the jump singularity at 0.

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

I see!

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

also, the second derivative, does exist and I'm not sure how that fn would do with the quotient rule

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

the second derivative will still have problem in 0?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

nope, because the limit exists, it will equal zero

OpenStudy (xapproachesinfinity):

eh right! my attention went to something else

myininaya (myininaya):

f(x)=a|x|=0 if a=0 => f'(x)=0 =>f'(0)=0 f(x)=a|x| for a not 0=>f'(x)=a|x|/x =>f'(0) does not exist -- this is my summary for this problem... I'm cool with this. Is this what everyone got back from this discussion? My choice B then would be right.

myininaya (myininaya):

if f(x)=|x| f''(x)=0 if x does not equal 0

myininaya (myininaya):

f''(0) does not exist if f(x)=|x|

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

yes, B would be correct, and hm are you sure, becasue we are working with limits, I think it does

myininaya (myininaya):

|dw:1416941950716:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!