I'm trying to find the area of the portion of a tilted plane inside a cylinder using parametrization, posted below momentarily.
http://i.imgur.com/7nHAfPy.png How exactly should I set up the vector r? I'm guessing I should base the parametrization of r off of the cylinder?
\[R(u,v) = \ ?\]
@FibonacciChick666 , could you help me out on this? Just trying to figure out the parametrization.
I'm working on a paper, but here is a really good explanation someone else wrote http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/817869/surface-integral-the-area-of-a-plane-inside-a-cylinder
ty!
np, good luck on the assignment
I'm trying to take a shot at this using a calculus-based approach, and have come up with this. @Zarkon , could you help me out with this/does this setup look okay for the parametrization of the curve intersecting the cylinder and the tilted plane? http://i.imgur.com/xhsfoyR.png
\[R(r,\theta)=r \cos(\theta)i + r \sin(\theta)j + (1-\frac{1}{2}r \sin(\theta))k.\]
\[R_r=\cos(\theta)+\sin(\theta)j-\frac{1}{2}\sin(\theta)k.\]
\[R_\theta = -r \sin(\theta)i+r \cos(\theta)j-\frac{1}{2}r \cos(\theta)k\]
@wio , could you help me out with this when you get a chance? Thanks so far.
This is a tricky one, no doubt.
If you use cylindrical coords then...
Sorry, was working on another problem. Wait, why isn't it 2z = 2 - y?
\[ y+2z=2\implies z=1-\frac y2 = 1-\frac{r\sin\theta}{2} \]
\[y+2z=2; \ \ \ 2z = 2-y; \ \ \ z = \frac{2-y}{2}\]
Either way is fine.
Your partial derivatives are fine as well.
Alright, cool, taking a shot at computing the cross product now between the two vectors that come from it. How do I set up the, uh....the determinant matrix in laTeX in this kinda environment? I think I'll just write it out
\[ \left|\mathbf \Phi_{r}\times \mathbf \Phi_{\theta}\right|= \begin{vmatrix} \mathbf i &\mathbf j &\mathbf k \\ \cos(\theta)&\sin(\theta)&-\frac 12 \sin(\theta)\\ -r\sin(\theta)&r\cos(\theta)&-\frac 12r \cos(\theta) \end{vmatrix} \]
(Just double checking the vector before taking the magnitude o fit)
Alright, now, taking the magnitude looks super ugly....takign a shot at it now.
Now that I think about it, I wonder if the normal vectors on the plane would be different.
Hm?
The normal vectors on the plane should be the same direction as the normal vectors on the disk we parametrized.
It's just maybe the magnitude is different.
I dunno, I'm being clueless atm and don't catch your drift; should I be taking the magnitude of that cross product as it stands?
Just keep doing what you were doing.
Not putting that all under a square root and summing it,
Okay, how the hell are you getting that?
Lul
Do we agree that the vector, before taking its magnitude, is http://i.imgur.com/BTgWUiw.png
\[ \begin{split} \left|\mathbf \Phi_{r}\times \mathbf \Phi_{\theta}\right| &=& \begin{vmatrix} \mathbf i &\mathbf j &\mathbf k \\ \cos(\theta)&\sin(\theta)&-\frac 12 \sin(\theta)\\ -r\sin(\theta)&r\cos(\theta)&-\frac 12r \cos(\theta) \end{vmatrix} \\ &=&+ \mathbf i\left(-\frac 12\sin(\theta) r\cos(\theta)+\frac 12\sin(\theta) r\cos(\theta)\right)\\ &&-\mathbf j\left(-\frac 12r\cos^2(\theta)-\frac 12r\sin^2(\theta)\right)\\ &&+\mathbf k\left(r\cos^2(\theta)+r\sin^2(\theta)\right) \\ &=&\left|\frac 12 r\mathbf j+r\mathbf k\right| = \sqrt{\frac 14r^2+r^2} = \frac{\sqrt 5}{2}r \end{split} \]
J component is one minus the other though, right? Minus a minus?
(but yeah I get your point lol)
The term is positive, but it gets subtracted.
Wait, the term is *negative*, but it gets subtracted, right, so it makes it a positive. One sec.
OH, I missed a minus sign in my original rprlbem neverMKFEWOHOJA
I gotchu
I'm bad at maths without paper, lol.
Alright, well, cool, got the general setup. Now going to go work some other problems, just need to watch for algebra errors. Thank you.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!