I think it's wrong, because it's 48, but I'm not sure.

Question

dumbsearch2 · Answer

attachment

unklerhaukus · Answer

12 + 22 + 11 =

dumbsearch2 · Answer

yes, it's 45.

However, in "H2O", it doesn't mean that each of them are zero? So I'm wondering if it would be 45+3.

dumbsearch2 · Answer

nevermind I wasn't making sense. That's not how exponents work.

unklerhaukus · Answer

I dont understand why you would be considering H_2O .
The question is about a single molecule of  C_12H_22O_11

unklerhaukus · Answer

What exponents are you referring to ?
There are no exponents (or superscripts) here, only subscripts

dumbsearch2 · Answer

Yes I'm sorry; I was not making sense because I'm very tired :) Sorry for wasting your time.
Obviously, it's 12 carbon, 22 hydrogen, and 11 oxygen.

unklerhaukus · Answer

ok ,

dumbsearch2 · Answer

ok ,

dumbsearch2 · Answer

people have, in the past, made stupid mistakes, and I'm not left out :)

unklerhaukus · Answer

yeah, join the club. I make many mistaks,

dumbsearch2 · Answer

This statement is correct, right? "A pure substance contains only one kind of matter"

unklerhaukus · Answer

I think so. But it really depends on how you define 'pure'.