Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@jim_thompson5910
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ok?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
oh ok thnxs!
OpenStudy (anonymous):
that makes sense
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
perl, there are 4+6 = 10 cases total
4 of those cases are remissions
4/10 = 0.4
OpenStudy (perl):
woops
OpenStudy (perl):
nvm :)
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I think its a
OpenStudy (perl):
can you give a justification
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
because both treatments have ehitr own pros and cons therefore it depends on the perspective of analysis
OpenStudy (perl):
when you divide the cancer patients by 'early stage cancer' and 'advanced stage cancer', you get different rate of remission than if you just pooled together the cancer patients
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so is a the right answer?
OpenStudy (perl):
i think so
OpenStudy (perl):
but
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (perl):
if you look at the top table, treatment A has better remission rates in both early stage cancer and advanced stage cancer.
OpenStudy (perl):
better than treatment B
OpenStudy (anonymous):
true thnxs!
OpenStudy (perl):
i would need more context to be certain , what they are looking for in the questin
OpenStudy (perl):
but i agree with your choice
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!