What transformation has changed the parent function f(x) = log2x to its new appearance shown in the graph below? logarithmic graph passing through point negative 2, 0. f(x + 3) f(x − 3) f(x) + 3 f(x) − 3 @ganeshie8 @hartnn @mathstudent55
f(x+3)
because log2(-2 + 3) = log2(1) = 0
please note that: \[f(-2+3)=\log _{2}(-2+3)=\log _{2}(1)=0\]
we have got same idea! @M4thM1nd
Exactly teh same lol
so A? @M4thM1nd
Yes
please don't give out answers directly! thanks.
he explained the steps -.- @hartnn
i explained @hartnn
you gave the answer, then explained. thats not how it should work :P
same thing.. at least ik how it should be done
considering the time interval between the answer and the explanation, the order does not matter ^^
Just kidding ;) Merry Christmas everybody
f(x)=log(x) is a parent function, and log(2x) is a vertical shift up by log(2). (because, log(2x)=log(2)+log(x), ) comparing f(x=log(x) << parent function f(g)=log(x)+log(2) << a very small vertical shift.
The function f(x) = 20(3)x represents the growth of a fish population every year in a local lake. Jesse wants to manipulate the formula to an equivalent form that calculates every half-year, not every year. Which function is correct for Jesse's purposes? f(x) = 20(3)the x over 2 power f(x) = 20(3 to the one half power)2x f(x) = twenty halves(3)x f(x) = 40(2)x @i
@iGreen
@tHe_FiZiCx99
@campbell_st
I NEED HELP PLZ ANYONE RN
@cwrw238 @Kainui
As you want half year, so f(x) = 20*(3)^(x/2) will give the growth of fishes in x half years
so f(x) = 20*(3)^(x/2)
@iamabarbiegirl
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!