What is the maximum number of relative extrema contained in the graph of this function? I'm getting 0? Is that right? f(x)=3x^4-x^2+4x-2
You found f' correct?
If so what did you get?
Im still not for sure on how to solve the problem in general. I'm solving it off a video I watched. I know you set it equal to zero, and thats what I did, but after that I'm very fuzzy on what exactly to do
You find the f'(x) (derivative) of f(x) and set it equal to zero, then solve for x.
That's the first step.
do you know power rule for differentiating?
\[(x^4)'=? \\ (x^2)'=? \]
This is what I got for the derivative? is that correct?\[12x^3-2x+4\]
Yes.
not set =0 and solve for x but eww yuck a cubic
So x would be -0.77317?
That's the only solution to that equation yes, but you can't determine it's the relative extrema just from that.
Okay so then what would I do next to determine the relative extrema?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=12x%5E3-2x%2B4%3D0 yep I would find f'' also and plug tht value into f''
f''(a)>0 implies at x=a there is a min f''(a)<0 implies at x=a there is a max
Could you possibly write it out and show me how to do that?
to find f'' you need to find the derivative of f'
can you do that?
\[f=3x^4-x^2+4x-2 \\ f'=12x^3-2x+4 \\ f''=(f')'=(12x^3-2x+4)'=?\]
\[36x^2-2\] Is that it?
yep
now replace x with the critical value you found
So I would do \[36(-0.77317)^2-2\]
and what does that give you? f''(a)>0 implies at x=a there is a min f''(a)<0 implies at x=a there is a max
is it positive or negative?
That gave me a positive answer, which was 19.52050656
ok so you have f''(a)>0 which implies at x=a there is a min where our a was -.77317 of course now that is where the min occurs now the actual min value
not the actual min value*
f(-.77317) will give you the min value
oh but you don't have to find that
it just asked for the number of max values
Yeah so then how would I find the maximum value with what I've found so far?
or the number of relative extreme
well we just found there was 1
If the only critical point you found turned out to be a min, there is no max.
you remember we determine at -.77317 we had a relative min
So it would be 0?
you know after reading your question again it seems weird to me
like how far do they want you to go
More like infinity, not 0.
if they wanted you to go as far as finding f' you could have 3 if they wanted you go as far as solving f'=0 then it would be 1
Did they ask you to find the relative extreme in a certain range? or of the whole graph?
if they wanted you to go as far as solving f'=0 and verifying it was an actually relative extreme then it would still be 1
Im in an online class through APEX so thats the exact question they asked. It has to be specific answer's. I'm not for sure how far they want me to go, due to not having a real teacher to tell me, or show me what I'm finding up to. It's all confusing to me.
well there is exactly one relative extrema
This is what I see
The problem I'm having is they wanted you to determine the maximum number of relative extrema that there could be f'=cubic cubic has 3 solutions (so from this step we could say there is at most 3) f'=0 will only give 1 real solution in this case (so there is at most 1; so it could be 0 or 1 at the step) f'=0 and then if f''>0 or if f''<0 then we have a relative extrema and this case we did (so we definitely have 1)
I answered with 1, and it told me that was wrong and that the correct answer was 3. Because "This is one less degree of the function."
yeah sorta why we needed to know how far they wanted us to go
f'=cubic tells us there is at most 3 relative extrema
I wasn't for sure myself, because like i said it's an online class with no teacher. I'm never for sure on how far it want's me to go ever.
lol that's kinda irritating i bet
Oh definitely. Especially not learning really how to do what it's"teaching," me. I have to resort to youtube video's 95% of the time!
It \(is\) irritating because many of the online questions expect an answer in their current context only. A proper question should be unambiguous in any context. :(
So I'm not the only one who found this question unambiguous? That is good to know.
Even though my first reaction was to answer n-1, but then with all the information available, a detailed investigation would not be inappropriate. So yes I find it ambiguous, the answer could be 0,1 or 3 under different contexts.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!