Help once again please! http://nimb.ws/Wkm84q
@aleroth
a) nope
Okay Let me look at my work.
b) nope
Thanks @OOOPS
0-0"! Can you please show work so I can understand what I did wrong @OOOPS
hihihi.. I just use calculator to find it out for a) when t =0, I take 120000/1250 =9.6
N(t) = 12 000 / ( 5 + 1245 * e^(-0.97t) ) a) N(0) = ? b) N(5) = ? c) N(x) = 1000 ?
for b) I do the same with t =5 and got the answer which is different from yours, hehehe....
lol oh, I was thinking in the sense that that can't 9.6 because .6 of a person can not know gossip but the whole person, but I guess it doesn't matter with math.
@aleroth a= 9.6 b=735.746 c=I don't know >-<
So a) 9.6 being rounded to 9 people makes sense. b) I get 813?
0o0"! How?!
@aleroth
12 000 / ( 5 + 1245 * e^(-0.97*5) ) = 12 000 / ( 5 + 9.74 ) = 12 000 / 14.74 = 814
Oh, okay I don't know what the heck I did to get that answer >_< Thanks ^^. Can You help with c @aleroth ?
c resembles the other exercise a lot, show me how far you can get without help :D
You just want to get the equation to equal 1000, by getting t alone
I know :) but this division bar is scaring me . 1000=12,000/(5+1245e^(-0.97t)
I subtracted 12,000 from each side.
brb
Alright, subtracting 12000 from both sides won't do what you think it does. When a number is multiplied or divided by something, then simply subtracting/adding won't get rid of it. See here for example: 2/x = 4 2/x - 2 = 4 - 2 <-- This thing is not the same thing as 0/x = 2??
Oh okay. I would like to be honest with you and say that example confuses me...
Okay, so you want to get the variable t all by itself. So it can't be in a denominator, it has to be on top, like t/1 is the same thing as t.
Yes :) that is true.
Right, so the trick to getting it up there is multiplying both sides by that denominator. you see?
Oh okay.
Now when you do that, the whole denominator will get over on the left side and on the right side you have the same thing in both the numerator and the denominator, so they cancel out and become 1, which you don't even need to write.
Okay.
You see it??
Yes, sorta, it's still some foggy spot but I see where your going with the concept.
You get: (1000)(5+1245e^-0.97t) = (12000)/(5+1245e^-0.97t)*(5+1245e^-0.97t) See how on the right side you get (5+1245e^-0.97t) in the denominator and numerator, which cancel and become 1. So you simplify the whole thing to: (1000)(5+1245e^-0.97t) = (12000)
This trick is really important to learn for further math (getting stuff up from the denominator)
Do you see how it works out?
Oh okay ! Thank you. And yes I see!
Awesome, do you know how to solve this from here or should I continue?
You should continue so I can see how it's done the total right way.
(1000)(5+1245e^-0.97t) = (12000) You are working towards getting t all by itself. So let's get rid of the thousand. We can't subtract by 1000, because it is multiplied by something else. You have to divide by 1000, yes! (1000)(5+1245e^-0.97t)/1000 = (12000)/1000 Simplifies to: (5+1245e^-0.97t) = (12) Here we can subtract the 5 from both because it is NOT multiplied by something else! 1245e^0.97t = (12) - (5)
(I missed a minus sign in the line above!) 1245e^-0.97t = 7 1245e^-0.97t = 7 is just another way to write 1245*e^(-0.97*t) = 7 Now we see we can divide by 1245, so you get: e^(-0.97*t) = 7/1245 Now we use logarithm again: ln(e^(-0.97*t) = ln(7/1245) -0.97*t = ln(7/1245) Now we divide both sides, by -0.97 (note can't subtract!): t = ln(7/1245)/(-0.97)
Calculating that should give you the answer. This was a lot of writing for one exercise, but I hope you learned something..
Yes I am very grateful and amazed by your brilliance. I really do I appreciate it :)
And I learned a new trick. Thank you! :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!