Question

Which of the following situations is an example of a civil case?

One person testifies against a teen thought to have spray-painted the park.
One person sues another for damage to the vehicle from their car accident.
A woman is accused of using another person’s driver’s license to get a job.
A man faces a jury under suspicion of breaking into and robbing a bank.

Answer 1

@EclipsedStar

Answer 2

@confluxepic

Answer 3

@helpandhey_101
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070213073047AAHOt7c
http://www.answers.com/Q/What_are_some_examples_of_civil_cases

Answer 4

ok so what is the answer

Answer 5

The option that is not a criminal case is the answer.

Answer 6

So which one is not a criminal case.

Answer 7

they are asking an ex. of a civil case??? @confluxepic

Answer 8

Yes.

Answer 9

\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @confluxepic
So which one is not a criminal case.
\(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
I said not.

Answer 10

ok well is the answer b???

Answer 11

Correct.

Answer 12

a?

Answer 13

@confluxepic

Answer 14

Yes.

Answer 15

But to what question.

Answer 16

then why did you say yes....

Answer 17

I said it to show you I was still on the post.

Answer 18

here

Answer 19

What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent?”

It cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” Juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.
The terms have no significant difference in meaning. Juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law.
“Not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. However, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.
A jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

Answer 20

What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent?”

It cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” Juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.

The terms have no significant difference in meaning. Juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law.

“Not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. However, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.

A jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

Answer 21

@confluxepic

Answer 22

what is the difference between the twerps "not guilty " and "innocent"?
It cannot be proved that an individual is innocent. Juries say not guilty because guilt was not proved in the case
The terms have no significant difference in meaning. Juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law
"Not guilty" is a verdict used in criminal cases only. However an "innocent" verdict can only be used in civil cases
A jury will say "innocent" instead of "not guilty"if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

Answer 23

@confluxepic now do you mind helping??? I think it is a

Answer 24

I can help now.

Answer 25

I recently solved this question.

Answer 26

http://www.oregoncriminalattorney.com/Criminal-Defense-Overview/Innocent-V-Not-Guilty.shtml
http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/32989/is-there-a-difference-between-innocent-and-not-guilty
http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_Difference_between_not_guilty_and_innocent
https://www.law.upenn.edu/fac/phrobins/books/notguilty.pdf

Answer 27

Not guilty means that there was not enough evidence to make sure the person is innocent.
Innocent means that the person has not committed a crime.

Answer 28

ok so what is the answer