i know how to prove it i think... but i dont understand what the professor means by this @ganeshie8 ||V+W||^2 = ||V||^2 + ||W||^2 + 2V*W (less than or equal to) ||V||^2 +||W||^2 +2||v||*||W|| = (||V|| + ||W||)^2 taking sqr ||V+W|| (less than or equal to) ||V||+||W||
like i get how it equals the first and second "line" but then i dont get how he jumps to the final line like what happened to the +2||V||||W|| ?
\[V\bullet W = \|V\| \|W\| \cos\theta \]
would you agree \(V\bullet W \le \|V\| \|W\| \) ?
yes
good
but how does that get into this "proof"?
so you agree that \(||V+W||^2 \le ||V||^2 +||W||^2 +2||v||*||W||\) ?
yeah
right hand side can be written as (||V|| + ||W||)^2 so thats same as \(||V+W||^2 \le (||V|| + ||W||)^2\) yes ?
ok wait hold on... lol let me try to process it ._.
recall the formula \[\heartsuit^2+\spadesuit^2 + 2\heartsuit \spadesuit = (\heartsuit + \spadesuit)^2\]
So i think i get. i got: ||V||^2 + ||W||^2 + 2V*W (less than or equal to) ||V||^2 + ||W||^2 + 2||V||||W|| so simply because 2V*W (less than or equal to) 2||V||||W|| it validates the upper equation, am i right?
Exactly!
oh ok. so why after did he put... = (||V|| + ||W||) ^2 taking sqrt you get the answer like coming from MY equation how would taking the sqrt get to the answer? I just stopped there because i justified it but i never ended up back to ||V+W|| (less than or equal to) ||V||+||W||
\[||V+W||^2 \le (||V|| + ||W||)^2\] are you okays up to this step ?
like i GET how it proves the inequality but how did he get rid of the 2V*W on the left side and 2||V||||W|| on the right to finally get ||V+W|| <or= ||V||+||W||
||V+W||^2 = ||V||^2 + ||W||^2 + 2V*W <= ||V||^2 + ||W||^2 + 2||V||||W || <= (||V|| + ||W||)^2
Notice that the left side is always ||V+W||^2 your prof is only messing witht he right hand side
oh *palm to the face* ughhh thank you for being so patient with me :) i get it. ._.
haha np:)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!