...
for the first to be defective, it will be \[1-(\frac{ 9 }{ 12 })^{2}\]?
i meant 9/12 raised to the 9th power
nope it should be simply \[\dfrac{3}{12}\]
for part b, it would be 3/12 * 9/11?
Yep
for both to be defective, it would be 3/12 * 2/11?
You got it!
for the second to be defective, it would be.......
2/11?
d and e are tricky
i figured lol
`d) The second air conditioner is defective ` forget about numbers and lets see in what ways this event can ever happen
in part d, we have to assume the probability of the first to be of either defective or good?
Exactly!
just add up the probabilities : P( `first defective` and `second defective`) + P( `first good` and `second defective`)
oh, i was thinking of subtracting something as well from that
thats good to think but i don't see anything to subtract here hmm
because they are not independent of each other, correct?
i meant dependent...
i guess so..
and for exactly one to be defective, it would be \[1 - (\frac{ 9 }{ 12 })^{9}\]
We disregard the probability of choosing a good event.
thats a good try but i think it is wrong
keep in mind you're looking at the parts one by one
i.e, with out replacement
would it be the summation of the first to be defective and the second to be defective?
`e) Exactly one is defective ` we can have this in two ways : P( `first defective` and `second good`) + P( `first good` and `second defective`)
you get \[\dfrac{3}{12}\times \dfrac{9}{11} + \dfrac{9}{12}\times \dfrac{3}{11}\]
But that means we have possibilities of good events?
for what i said, it would be equal to: P(first is defective) + P(second is defective) - P(both are defective) But i like yours better.
I see what you're doing now :) that looks good
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!