The graph of the following system of equations is
@TheSmartOne
first, you want to convert this to y=mx+b form. can you do this? @Sparklestaraa
you can see that the second equation is three times the first equation. That means the first and the second equations are the same, so they are...?
to convert to y=mx+b, you have to solve for y Here's an example: 2x+y=6 -2x -2x -------- y=-2x+6 ^ does that make sense? now try the other equation @Sparklestaraa
myltiply every term in the 1st line by 3, what do you get..?
waiting for a response from the asker...
Ok
@Jamierox4ev3r i agree with @M4thM1nd because if you convert the lines to y=mx+b form, she'll just be doing extra work
6x + 3y = 18 3y=18+6x?
ah true i didn't even see that xDD but converting the equations makes it that much easier to see
@Sparklestaraa then divide everything by 3 3y=-6x+18 /3 /3 /3 --------- y=
here is my suggestion take the 1st line 3x + y = 6 and multiply every term by 3 \[3 \times 2x + 3 \times y = 3 \times 6\] what do you notice... that's all the calculation you need for the question
@campbell_st or divide the second equation by 3 which would make it easier for everyone to see
\[\frac{ 6x+3y=18 }{ 3 }\]
lol... funny thing is... people find multiplication easier than division... but its whatever @Sparklestaraa finds easier... I just posted my comment as it appeared that the methods suggested contained unnecessary steps
XD really @campbell_st ? i never knew that
so please choose whatever method you feels suits you.... the key to the question is looking 1st then thinking what you can do. it all comes with experience.
I don't know which is better i really don't still understand it
an alternate method is to graph both lines and study them that way.
oh no the graph is confusing in itself so idk whichever method is easier
every method posted will get you to a solution... so it depends on what skills you have and what you feel comfortable with.
idk maybe the multiplication but I'm lacking skills xD @campbell_st
@SyedMohammed98 :D SHUKRAN :D
|dw:1424633092263:dw|
They are parallel correct
yupp
@ThatOneGuy00
these lines aren't parallel multiply every term in the 1st line by 3 \[3 \times 2x + 3 \times y = 3 \times 6~~~~so~you~get~~~~6x + 3y = 18\] the 2nd line is 6x + 3y = 18 so you have the same line... or overlapping... the 1st line sits exactly on top of the 2nd line...
oops...sorry
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!