plz help me and i will give you medel explain red under lines
What is the question
Like what is an example?
Please be more specific.
ok so what you want is
3rd and 4th line " if t = x/1+x then then 0<t<1 then t^n<t<x hence E is not empty and next step if t>1+x then....... this part is confuding me first question is why he choose t = x/1+x and secong question is in 3rd line he said t^n< t<x means (t<x)but in 4th line he write "t>1+x" how its possible?
i want to know what writer (rudin) did and how he did?
the answer to "why he chose it" is obscure, probably because this is what makes the proof work
actually it is not that obscure the first step is to show that E is not empty, E being the set of all numbers \(t\) such that \(t^n<x\)
@satellite73 i wana answer of my second question look at 3rd and 4th line in 3rd line t<x but in 4th line t>1+x how he did ?
let me look carefully
actually now i am confused he says if \(t>1+x\) then \(t^n>1>x\) but i am confused as to why \(1>x\)
do it carefully @satellite73 i m working on this problem since few days. i didnt get any help from google or youtube .....
ooh no duh i read it wrong sorry
it says if \(t>1+x\) then \(t^n>t>x\) and that is pretty clear
i it pretty obvious that if \(t>1+x\) then \(t>x\) right?
yes this is 4th line but in 3rd line he said \[t^{n}<t <x\] 3rd and 4rh line are opposite to each other
they are two separate cases there is an IF between them
IF \(t=\frac{x}{1+x}\) then blah blah so E is not empty IF \(t>1+x\) then blah blah so \(t\) is not in E so \(1+x\)is a upper bound
yes i know two different cases but in first case he already proved that t<x then how he take t>1+x?
IIIIFFFFF
look lets do it with a number and see what it means
lets show that there is a number in the set E, where E is the set of numbers \(t\) for which \(t^2<3\)
x is also upper bond becoz x is greater then t and also t^n then why he felt to take 1+x
if \(t=\frac{3}{4}\) then \(t^2<1<3\) so E is not empty If \(t>1+3=4\) then \(t^2>t>3\) i.e. \(4^2>4>3\) so \(4\) is not in E
oh i think i can explain that
suppose \(t=\frac{1}{3}\) then it is not true that \(t^n>t\)
to prove upper bound which theorem or property he used?
he showed that \(1+x\) is an upper bound for E, i.e. that if \(t=1+x\) then \((1+x)^n>x^n\) so \(1+x\) is n upper bound for E
how he proved? using any contradiction of case one ?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!