for the following statements, use the law of detachment to write a valid concluding statement. if a number is a perfect square, it is not prime. 49 is a perfect square
@bibby
p->q p --- q (our concluding statement as far as I can tell)
q is the concluding statement ?
yeah, in this case. p->q is ``` if a number is a perfect square, it is not prime. ``` where p = if a number is a perfect square, and so q = it is not prime our additional information: ``` 49 is a perfect square ``` given that, we have p, and therefore q is true
where q is 49 is not prime
OH. okay i see what you did there.
basically the truth table for implies is http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/truth_table_impl.gif so the only time p->q (the whole statement) evaluates to true (given that p is true) is when q is also true
that definitely makes more sense looking at the chart.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!