Ask your own question, for FREE!
Geometry 21 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

for the following statements, use the law of detachment to write a valid concluding statement. if a number is a perfect square, it is not prime. 49 is a perfect square

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@bibby

OpenStudy (bibby):

p->q p --- q (our concluding statement as far as I can tell)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

q is the concluding statement ?

OpenStudy (bibby):

yeah, in this case. p->q is ``` if a number is a perfect square, it is not prime. ``` where p = if a number is a perfect square, and so q = it is not prime our additional information: ``` 49 is a perfect square ``` given that, we have p, and therefore q is true

OpenStudy (bibby):

where q is 49 is not prime

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OH. okay i see what you did there.

OpenStudy (bibby):

basically the truth table for implies is http://www.metafysica.nl/nature/truth_table_impl.gif so the only time p->q (the whole statement) evaluates to true (given that p is true) is when q is also true

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that definitely makes more sense looking at the chart.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!