Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Does the series (below) converge absolutely, conditionally, or diverge?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n+1}(0.1)^{n}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I know that it converges absolutely, but doesn't it fill all 3 criteria for the alternating series test?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have checked online and people are only mentioning the absolute convergence

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The answer seems to only be that it converges absolutely, but it also fulfills all 3 criteria for the alternating series test, so shouldn't it converge conditionally as well?

OpenStudy (rational):

if the absolute value of series converges, then the actual series also converges.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, I know, but can't a series converge conditionally as well?

OpenStudy (perl):

If a series converges absolutely, then a series converges conditionally. the converse is not always true (e.g. \( \sum \)(-1)^n * 1/n ) therefore absolute convergence is a stronger condition

OpenStudy (rational):

we say a series converges conditionally when the absolute value of series diverges but the actual series converges

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So I dont even need to prove that it converges conditionally if it converges absolutely?

OpenStudy (perl):

$$ \Large \rm \sum |a_n|~ converges \Rightarrow \sum a_n ~converges $$

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm talking about conditionally. If a series converges absolutely then it converges conditionally as well?

OpenStudy (perl):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But some of the problems only converge absolutely

OpenStudy (rational):

\[\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} |a_n| \ge \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\] If the left side series converges, then by comparison test the right side series also converges.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I know that. My confusion is with conditional convergence

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@perl some of the series converge absolutely but not conditionally, so thats not true

OpenStudy (rational):

perl is right, above comparison test tells you that if a series converges absolutely, then the actual series also converges.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

conditionally

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am talking about conditional convergence

OpenStudy (rational):

you seem to have two confusions regarding terminology, let me clear them up

OpenStudy (anonymous):

conditional convergence is not regular convergence

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And Perl said that if a function converges absolutely, then it converges conditionally as well, which I disproved in my homework like 3 times

OpenStudy (rational):

could you show one example of your homework where you proved absolute convergence need not imply conditional convergence ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n+1}\frac{ \sin(n) }{ n^2 }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sin(n)/n^2 is not always positive, so it does not pass the alternating series test

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But it passes the limit comparison test

OpenStudy (rational):

You're correct about that series not passing the hypothesis of alternating series test. So that just means you cannot use alternating series test for that series. Thats all.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We haven't been given any other tests for conditional convergence

OpenStudy (rational):

Alternating series test never tells you about divergence

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But it does tell you whether a series converges conditionally or not

OpenStudy (rational):

You cannot apply alternating series test here because the series doesn't meet the hypothesis of alternating series test. End of story.

OpenStudy (rational):

go and use some other test

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I wasn't given another conditional convergence test

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That was THE only one

OpenStudy (rational):

lets look at absolute value of series first

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok

OpenStudy (rational):

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left| (-1)^{n+1}\frac{ \sin(n) }{ n^2 }\right|~~ =~~ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left|\frac{ \sin(n) }{ n^2 }\right| \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, and that converges absolutely by the limit comparison test

OpenStudy (rational):

Since \(|\sin(n)|\le 1\), we have \[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left|\frac{ \sin(n) }{ n^2 }\right| \le \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{ 1 }{ n^2 }\] By comparison with p-series test the left hand side series converges.

OpenStudy (rational):

The absolute value of series converges, therefore the series also converges. And we say the series converges absolutely.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok

OpenStudy (rational):

Absolute converges ====> actual series converges

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So therefore it is supposed to converge conditionally, right?

OpenStudy (rational):

Absolute convergence : when the "absolute value of series" converges, the "actual series" also converges and we say the series converges absolutely. Conditional convergence : when the "absolute value of series" diverges, but the "actual series" converges. we say the series only converges conditionally

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mmm

OpenStudy (rational):

it is wrong to say Absolute convergence ====> conditional convergence correct way to say is : Absolute convergence ====> the actual series converges

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Perl said that the first one is true

OpenStudy (rational):

Stick to the definitions and they will make sense

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok. But a series can converge both absolutely AND conditionally, right?

OpenStudy (rational):

tell me this, when do you say "a series converges conditionally" ?

OpenStudy (rational):

also provide one example of a series that converges conditionally

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A series converges conditionally if it passes the Alternating Series Test (it can fill the 3 criteria for the test)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n+1}(0.1)^n\] converges conditionally

OpenStudy (rational):

Wrong.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How so

OpenStudy (rational):

To say "a series converges conditionally", you must do two things : 1) you must prove that the "absolute value of series diverges" 2) the actual series converges.

OpenStudy (rational):

does the abolute value of your example series diverge ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Taken directly from my book: "The series \[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^n+1Un \] converges if all three of the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Each Un is positive; 2. Un >= Un+1 for all n>=N, for some integer N; 3. limn->infty Un->0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It should be (-1)^(n+1)Un

OpenStudy (rational):

yeah thats alternating series test

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which proves conditional convergence

OpenStudy (rational):

which can be used to test convergence of "actual series"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh snap, I just found a small side-note section talking about conditional convergence only happening if it isn't absolutely convergent, but still convergent

OpenStudy (rational):

To say "the seris converges conditionally", you must show that the "absolute value of series diverges"

OpenStudy (rational):

Yep thats right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh my god. That means that I just spent like 2 hours doing my homework wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

In my defense, my teacher never made that clear to us

OpenStudy (rational):

Haha happens, this thing trips everyone in the start

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok. So I have to use like the ratio test or the LCT or the DCT or etc to show that the absolute value doesn't converge??

OpenStudy (rational):

which series are you talking about

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well any series if I want to prove that it converges conditionally (or doesn't if the absolute value doesn't diverge)

OpenStudy (rational):

Yes. lets work a quick example

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok cool

OpenStudy (rational):

\[\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\dfrac{(-1)^n}{n}\] state whether the series is : 1) conditionally convergent, or 2) absolutely convergent

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It can technically be both though, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not specifically this one, but generally?

OpenStudy (rational):

it can never be both.

OpenStudy (rational):

look at definition of each of those terms again

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not on the same interval but I mean if a series has an interval of convergence, it could be conditionally convergent at the endpoints but absolutely convergent in the middle

OpenStudy (rational):

lets not even talk about power series/interval of convergence yet

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok, but I think that's the root of my confusion

OpenStudy (rational):

the definitions of "absolute convergence" or "conditional convergence" have nothing to do with power series / alternating series

OpenStudy (rational):

the definitions are more general, they are not based on alternating series test

OpenStudy (rational):

you can tell whether a series is "absolutely convergenct" or "conditionally convergent" without using alternating series test.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok. But it is possible that if a series has an interval of convergence, that it exhibits both types of convergence. Not in the same places, but over the interval, both happen at different times. I got that the absolute value diverges BTW

OpenStudy (rational):

Yes, in any given interval, a series is EITHER "absolutely convergent" or "conditionally convergent". It is wrong to say the series is both "absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent". It makes no sense

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1429399637257:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!