will fan and medal Find the curvature of r(t) = (12sint,5t,12cost) at the point (0,5pi,-12)
i used second formula in http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/Curvature_files/eq0005P.gif
Yeah, that should work
i have an answer and would like someone to verify my answer is correct
Sure, can you please show all your steps though.
my answer came out to 12
Well that's not very useful to me, if you want to check your steps post them.
i dont want to type it all out. i was hoping someone would work the problem to check
We're not here to do your work, but we are willing check YOUR work.
ok ill wait for someone who is capable of doing the problem
What makes you think anyone here is willing to type it all out? At the very least, you could show the tiniest bit of effort to perhaps *show* you've tried.
i do not anyone to type it out. Just to work the problem. i am not a very fast typer and suck with the equation button. i showed the formula i was using
its an exam review with no answers. I was hoping someone would work the problem and say yes that is what i got or no that is not what i got
Grr I'm a lil rusty on these. What is T again? \[\Large\rm \hat T=\frac{\vec r'}{||\vec r'||}\]Like that or something?
Tangent
Mmm ok I'll try using that one then. >.< In case we end up with different answers, then we can maybe back up and see where we went wrong.
ok sounds great
Might take me a few minutes >.< ahhh the rust is real
Checking with Mathematica, the answer is not \(12\).
If you can show your steps, you know we can pinpoint where you made the mistake...otherwise seems you just want a direct answer.
that strange that i would get perfect squares in my simplification then. What was it?
ohh wait i got my mistake
\[\Large\rm \vec r=\left<12 \sin t, 5t, 12 \cos t\right>\]Then,\[\Large\rm \vec r'=\left<12 \cos t, 5, -12 \sin t\right>\]and,\[\Large\rm \vec r''=\left<-12 \sin t, 0, -12\cos t\right>\] And you were using the second method?
i did not cube the bottom was it 12/169 ?
yes i was using the second method and that is what i got for the r values
@SithsAndGiggles was it 12/169
No, but it's certainly closer. You're off by about 0.03. Have you attempted using the formula on the left?
if im off by .03 then maybe mathmatica is a approximation instead of exact? i am not using a calculator
Yah I hate doing that stupid cross product >.<
i agree lol
\[\begin{align*}\vec{T}(t)&=\frac{\vec{r}~'(t)}{\|\vec{r}~'(t)\|}\\\\&=\frac{\langle 12\cos t,5,-12\sin t\rangle}{\sqrt{12^2\cos^2t+25+(-12)^2\sin^2t}}\\\\&=\frac{\langle 12\cos t,5,-12\sin t\rangle}{\sqrt{144+25}}\\\\ &=\frac{1}{13}\langle 12\cos t,5,-12\sin t\rangle\end{align*}\] Is this what you have?
i never calculated the tangent but yeah that looks right
Hmm I came up with 12/169 also :P darn
i think that is probably right then. did you do the first formula?
Ya, I kept screwing up doing that cross product, so I switched to the first one. Wolfram seems to agree. :O https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=curvature+of+r%3D%3C12+sin+t%2C+5t%2C+12+cos+t%3E+at+t%3Dpi
wow thanks i did know how to type that in to wolf, that would of saved a lot of time
thanks for the help
Ya, whenever you're not quite sure how to type it, try using a lot of "words" instead of symbols. usually works :O
ok i tried typing the vector into it but i never typed curvature. good to know. thank as well sith
Aw Siff >.< you were gonna show up the magic lol
Doing both methods, I didn't see a time where I could plug in the t value. Every t just fell out in the end. So this surface has constant curvature I guess? It's some type of sphericalllll shinanigans or something?
Yes, we often call it an osculating sphere if k>0
does that look right to you astro lol
There might be some typo in the Mathematica file then. I'm getting \(\dfrac{12}{169}\) now. We have \(\vec{T}~'(t)=\dfrac{1}{13}\langle -12\sin t,0,-12\cos t\rangle\), which means \(\left\|\vec{T}~'(t)\right\|=\sqrt{\dfrac{(-12)^2\sin^2t+0^2+(-12)^2\cos^2t}{13^2}}=\dfrac{12}{13}\). Then\[\begin{align*} \kappa(t)&=\frac{\dfrac{12}{13}}{13}=\frac{12}{169} \end{align*}\]
Yes it's good
good i glad your here to say you agree
Sorry to doubt you I suppose, I deal with a lot of people who just want the answer.
@zepdrix Yeah the curve defines a helix.
Hmm neato :)
@SithsAndGiggles @Astrophysics I dunno why you guys fuss about it so much :D If someone doesn't care enough about their education to actually try, it's on them. It'll catch up to them eventually. They're just doing themselves a disservice. I guess I just like to assume that people have good intentions when they're on this site, maybe that's naive though :)
Thanks @zepdrix I often tell myself that to, you have the right idea, they will eventually learn I guess, the way I handle it never really works or it's very rare. Thanks :)
this is calculus 3 as well, if i just put the answer down my prof would laugh and give me a zero even if it was correct
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!