Question

Recall that Impromptu was a satire of the Chou leaders that critiqued their dealing with dangerous rulers. Explain the necessity for the use of satire in this poem. Why might the author not have felt free to voice his opinion about the Chou leaders frankly?

Answer 1

Is this an essay question? :) I'd like to know if there are answers before typing out some long-winded reply. :P

Answer 2

its an essay question

Answer 3

Ah, okay. Well, that makes it trickier, since I have not read whatever it is you did. But, in my opinion, when subtly "critiquing" a form of leadership, you couldn't have just said "they suck!" you know, because their heads could be literally removed. Satire is defined as "vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule", but another way to say that is sarcasm, essentially. Not outright insulting a person, but still expressing your own distaste or aggravation. Often times, sarcasm can go over a persons head, so it's safer to use it. You can still feel satisfied with your insult without getting in trouble. That is why satire would be necessary for this kind of work.

Answer 4

okay thank you

Answer 5

You're welcome, hon. :)