Question

(3 pt) What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?

A.
Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do.

B.
The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to prove it.

C.
Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do.

D.
The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it.

Answer 1

@texaschic101
@freckles
@geekfromthefutur
@Kainui
@YGHOOTIE

Answer 2

i say C im not sure tho

Answer 3

Darwin's argued that the evolution of the biological species takes place according to the natural selection, as the fittest one survives over others. That's called Darwinism. Lamarck, on the other hand, argued that when a particular feature of an organism is being used extensively, the next generation would favor to increase the efficiency of that particular feature in order to adapt to the environment better. In other words, according to Lamarck, the characteristics that were acquired in one particular generation would pass or inherit to the next generation. That is known as "inheritance of acquired characteristics", or Lamarckism. Darwinism is more accepted than Lamarckism by the present-day scientific community.


www.differencebetween.com/...darwin-and-vs-lamarck

Answer 4

@geekfromthefutur that is true

Answer 5

So reading this we know its not A or B. it is either C, or D

Answer 6

ok thanks

Answer 7

Do u knw wat it is like take guess ik what it is

Answer 8

its C