Question

help me please

Answer 1

For centuries, the rich and the powerful documented their existence and their status through painted portraits. A marker of wealth and a bid for immortality, portraits offer intriguing hints about the daily life of their subjects – professions, ambitions, attitudes, and, most importantly, social standing. Such portraits, as German art historian Hans Belting has argued, can be understood as "painted anthropology," with much to teach us, both intentionally and unintentionally, about the culture in which they were created."

The article says profile pictures are different from portraits because

they last longer than portraits
they don't last as long as portraits
they never look as nice as portraits
they are usually out of focus

Answer 2

they don't last as long as portraits
i think

Answer 3

i thought the same thing and can you help m with another one

Answer 4

"A marker of wealth and a bid for immortality, portraits offer intriguing hints about the daily life of their subjects – professions, ambitions, attitudes, and, most importantly, social standing."

Answer 5

Rosen cites which networking study in her article?

The Small World Experiment
The Kevin Bacon Trial
The Last Person Standing Survey
The One-to-One Ratio Research

Answer 6

For this one I would have to say 'the small world experiment' but what do you think??

Answer 7

@hannah120899

Answer 8

i really donyt know how did you get that

Answer 9

Okay I've decided to change my answer to D.

Answer 10

whys that?

Answer 11

@open.owl

Answer 12

Idk if they are talking about "daily life of their subjects – professions, ambitions, attitudes, and, most importantly, social standing." Then the answer that speaks to me is D or C. Mainly D.