Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

A certain college graduate borrows 6038 dollars to buy a car. The lender charges interest at an annual rate of 12 %. Assuming that interest is compounded continuously and that the borrower makes payments continuously at a constant annual rate k dollars per year, determine the payment rate that is required to pay off the loan in 7 years. Also determine how much interest is paid during the 7-year period.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So we use that one equation, \(\large\rm A=Pe^{rt}\) for continuous compounding, ya? We start with a principle loan of \(\rm P=6038\) and an interest rate of \(\rm r=0.12\).\[\large\rm A=6038e^{.12t}\] At \(\rm t=7\) years, we want the amount \(\rm A\) to be fully paid off, so \(\rm A=0\). And we're making these payments of k... hmm how do we make that happen :) Thinking...

zepdrix (zepdrix):

If we're making this payment \(\rm k\) once every year, then after the first year we will subtract \(\rm k\) from the total amount that we owe,\[\large\rm A_1=6038e^{.12(1)}-k\]But then when we go to calculate next years stuff... it's going to be based on this new amount :o Hmm this is tricky...

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Err wait, is interest always calculated from the principle? I always forget how that works. Ya ya that would make a lot more sense.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So after the 7th year, we will have made 7 of these k payments.\[\large\rm 0=6038e^{.12* 7}-7k\]So I plugged in 0 for the amount owed. We've fully paid off the loan in 7 years. I plugged in t=7, because this is the specific time that we're interested in, 7 years after the start of the loan. And I subtracted 7 equal amounts, k, from the amount that we owe.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Solve for k! :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so I got 1998.03 as k, but that is not the correct answer.. :(

zepdrix (zepdrix):

It's not? :[ Hmmmm

zepdrix (zepdrix):

@ganeshie8 @zzr0ck3r @dan815 How do these compound interest questions work? Is interest calculated off of the principle amount? Or is it being recalculated after each time you make a payment?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

principal* amount... bahh I think I've been spelling that wrong the entire time lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm, your steps made sense, so I'm not sure what's wrong.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

@zepdrix shouldn't the interest be calculated on the previous year's outstanding balance ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I looked in my diff eq text and the model that they introduced involving interest rate is\[\frac{ dP }{ dt }=rP(t)+b\] where b is the constant rate of adding/withdrawing. But this didn't make much sense to me and where to go after that.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Outstanding balance at the end of year 1 : \[\rm 6038e^{.12} -k\] Outstanding balance at the end of year 2 : \[\rm (6038e^{.12} -k)e^{.12} - k =6038e^{2*.12} -ke^{.12}-k \] Outstanding balance at the end of year 3 : \[\rm ((6038e^{.12} -k)e^{.12} - k)e^{.12} -k = 6038e^{3*.12} -ke^{2*.12}-ke^{.12}-k \]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

I dunno how interest works :) lol Is it always based off of the current balance? I guess that makes sense :p

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This is the solution I found to a similar problem elsewhere, but it didn't make much sense to me

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

in that solution, \(S(t)\) represents the outstanding balance at any given time

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see that they used the method of integrating factor to solve the solution. But after that, I'm not sure what they did. And I'm not sure why they used t=3

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Firstly, notice that two things affect the change in outstanding balance \(S(t)\) : 1) outstanding balance itself (S) 2) payments made (k)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

If you're not making any payments, there will be a positive change in the outstanding balance (growth) : \[\dfrac{dS}{dt} = rS\] However if you do make payments "continuously" (practically impossible) so that "k" dollars is being paid yearly, the outstanding balance will be reduced : \[\dfrac{dS}{dt} = rS-k\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

it is an ordinary "separable" differential equation, you can solve it using any of the tricks that you're familiar with. you don't really need integrating factor..

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Once you have the solution, the function S(t) represents the outstanding balance. For the loan to be completely paid off in \(3\) years, \(S(3)\) must equal \(0\). Set that equal to \(0\) and solve \(k\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

And yes, in that solution, they want to pay off the loan in \(3\) years. thats the reason they are setting S(3) equal to 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah for some reason that didn't make sense at first when looking at it, but I understand it now! Do you mind if I ask you another question regarding a differential equation problem that I'm having difficulty with?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

I can try, but just so you know, zepdrix is the master of differential equations around here..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A skydiver weighing 232 lb (including equipment) falls vertically downward from an altitude of 6 000 ft and opens the parachute after 12 s of free fall. Assume that the force of air resistance, which is directed opposite to the velocity, is 0.77 vertical line v vertical line when the parachute is closed and 14 vertical line v vertical line when the parachute is open, where the velocity v is measured in ft/s. Use g equals 32 ft/s2. Round your answers to two decimal places. (a) Find the speed of the skydiver when the parachute opens. v(12) = ?? (b) Find the distance fallen before the parachute opens. x(12) = ?? (c) What is the limiting velocity v Subscript Upper L after the parachute opens? VL = ?? I know that the model I should use is similar to\[m \frac{ dv }{ dt }=mg-\gamma v\] But I don't know where to go from there..

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

so the air resistance in the interval \((0, 12)\) is \(0.77\overline{v}\) afterwards, the air resistance is \(14\overline{v}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I apologize, it's suppose to say |v|, not vertical line. But when I copied some of the question, it transferred weird.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Thats okay, vertical lines just indicate the magnitude

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

so the air resistance in the interval \((0, 12)\) is \(0.77|v|\) afterwards, the air resistance is \(14|v|\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Notice that part \(a\) and \(b\) concern with the interval \((0, 12)\) so simply solve the differential equation \(mv' = mg - 0.77v\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

For parts \(a\) and \(b\) : \[232\dfrac{dv}{dt} = 232*32-0.77v\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

solving should be easy, once you have the solution, \(v(t)\), simply plugin \(t = 12\) for part \(a\) we will see how to work part \(b\) after that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This is the general solution that I got. Is this correct? \[v=9696.96+\frac{ c }{ e^{.0033t} }\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

solve \(c\) using the fact that the body is "free falling"

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

what do you know about the initial velocity of a free falling body ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's 0 initially

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

right, \(v(0) = 0\) use that to find the value of \(c\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So C=-9696.96 where the negative indicates the downward orientation

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

looks good, wolfram says \(v(t) = \frac{742400}{77} \left(1-e^{-77t/23200}\right)\) http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+232v%27%28t%29+%3D+232*32+-+77%2F100v%28t%29%2C+v%280%29%3D0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That doesn't look like the same thing that I got though.. =/

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

they are same, you have converted everything to decimals, wolfram didn't

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so then plug in 12 for t and that will give me the velocity needed for a

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yes. use the wolfram answer, looks you have rounded a lot, so your numbers are way off..

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

not a big deal if you hadn't rounded, you would have gotten the exact same answer as wolfram..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so I got is 376.45

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

v(12) = 376.45 looks good

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so from there how do I calculate height? I could use the kinematic equations from physics 1, but I think they want me to use their methods.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Distance*

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

what do you know about the relation between "velocity" and "displacement" ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\frac{ dx }{ dt }=v\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[x(12) - x(0) = \int\limits_0^{12} v(t)\, dt\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

plugin \(v(t)\) and evaluate the definite integral

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[x(12)-x(0) = \int\limits_0^{12}\frac{742400}{77} \left(1-e^{-77t/23200}\right)\, dt\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

evaluating is trivial don't let the messy numbers confuse you

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, I got 115698.2487

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which doesn't make sense since he starts at an altitude of 6,000ft...

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

doesn't look correct wolfram says \( x(12)-x(0) \approx 2274\) http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=+%5Cint_0%5E%7B12%7D+%5Cfrac%7B742400%7D%7B77%7D*%5Cleft%281-e%5E%7B-77t%2F23200%7D%5Cright%29%5C%2C+dt

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Damn. I'm trying to do it by hand because I know that we're not allowed to use a calculator but I don't think something like this will be expected with such odd numbers. That makes more sense though haha

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

They probably don't expect you to put it in decimals

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's also true.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So far, (a) 376.45 and (b) 2274 are wrong :(

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

both wrong ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah..

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

how many more attempts do u have

OpenStudy (anonymous):

2

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Check v(12) again

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Hmm...maybe they want a rounded answer? Significant digits?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If I use wolfram alpha's equation \[v(t)=\frac{ 742400 }{ 77 }(1-e^{-77t/23200})\] then v(12) would give me 376.45

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yes, I don't see how part a could be anything different from \(376.4536197750639610724810777669453859565565074584767314312593...\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh, maybe it's suppose to be negative? But then again, part (b) is still wrong too..

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

speed cannot be negative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

True -- I was thinking of velocity.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

part a was about speed right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Find the speed of the skydiver when the parachute opens.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

I'll stick to \(v(12) = 376.45\) for part \(a\) and \(x(12) =2273.71 \) for part \(b\) and blame the grader for now :)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Was the force of air resistance0.77|v|?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, when the parachute is closed and 14|v| when it opens.

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[\huge v(t) = Ce^{-(0.77/m)t}+\frac{ mg }{ 0.77 }\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Correct?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Solve for C with the initial conditions

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's weird. So it looks like you solved it using separable equations. But why is it different than solving it using integrating factor?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So when I solved it using separable equations, I got \[v(t)=Ce^{-\frac{ m }{ .77 }t} +\frac{ mg }{ .77 }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Using your equation, I still get 376.45 when I plug in 12 for t

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Hmm yeah, me too

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Can you take a screenshot of the question and post it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

The first one should be right, the second you should add two decimal places

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

For the last question you need to take the limit as t approaches infinity, that's where your initial velocity will be v(12)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

So you have to find a dif equation for that to but now you'll have 14|v|

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

But I really don't see what's wrong with part a) :\ ganeshie you see anything?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Maybe write 376.50 lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah I have no idea what's wrong with it.. Though somehow in my notes I end up with something different. The general model that our professor gave us was \[v(t)=Ce^{\frac{ -m }{ .77 }t}+\frac{ mg }{ .77 }\] In yours, you have -.77/m, the reciprocal of what's in the exponent. But what's weird is that solving mine gave me some very high number. But solving yours gives me the exact same thing as before lol

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I moved the m here mdv/dt to the right side

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

∫1/m dt

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Well it's late, I'm off to bed, good luck, maybe email your prof and ask...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks for your help and time! :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!