Can anyone help me? I"ll medal and thank you
@Michele_Laino
here you have to apply the formula, which gives the value of \(r\)
how would you take into the formula then?
im confused becasue I dont understand how that works exactly
you have to substitute your numerical data. More precisely, you have 5 ordered pairs, so we can write this: \[\begin{gathered} {x_1} = 0.31 \hfill \\ {x_2} = 0.85 \hfill \\ {x_3} = 1.26 \hfill \\ {x_4} = 2.47 \hfill \\ {x_5} = 3.75 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \] and analogously for y's: \[\begin{gathered} {y_1} = 0.82 \hfill \\ {y_2} = 1.95 \hfill \\ {y_3} = 2.18 \hfill \\ {y_4} = 3.01 \hfill \\ {y_5} = 6.07 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \]
ok im with you on this so far
thats five for x and y
Yes! do you know the formula of \(r\)?
yes thats it right?
please wait I retrieve my textbook
I have this formula: \[\Large r = \frac{{\sum {\left( {x - \bar x} \right)\left( {y - \bar y} \right)} }}{{{{\left\{ {\sum {{{\left( {x - \bar x} \right)}^2}\sum {{{\left( {y - \bar y} \right)}^2}} } } \right\}}^{1/2}}}}\]
of course, all summations run from 1 to 5
furthermore with the symbol \({\bar x}\) I mean the mean value
hmm and so we use this for the formula of r
Yes! here is my reference textbook: \[\begin{gathered} {\text{An Introduction to Error Analysis}}{\text{.}} \hfill \\ {\text{The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \] Author: John R. Taylor Publisher: University Science Books
of course I have the italian translation
but what could we imply that we put in for the answers?
the third answer depends on the value of \(r\). At the moment, without such value of \(r\) I can not say anything
I guess that \(r\) is close to unit, nevertheless it is only a conjecture
please try to compute the value of \(r\) with my formula above, and then tag me
so would a correct answer for B be the answer of the formula?
How far did you get ?
currently im guessing B is asking that the foumla is the answer? correct?
I interpret it as asking for the numerical value for r which means you have to calculate it I would use Michele's formula posted up above. the first step is find the average x value and the average y value
ok im working on it now
ok so i worked some with a cal and on paper and got .717
I think it should be closer to 1, but I have not calculated it.
did you do it in your head?
It looks like a straight line can go through most of the points.
which formula are you using ?
im using the one i did http://www.rtmsd.org/cms/lib9/PA01000204/Centricity/Domain/197/Key_3.2_Correlation_Homework.pdf
that r=0.97 looks good
I got r=0.967
If I were estimating it, I would guess about 0.9 because the dots almost all lie on the same line, except for one dot a perfect line has r=1 because it's not perfect I would guess 0.9 (but it's just a guess)
yeas I"ll go with 0.97 for rounding reasons
hmm
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!