Below is a two-column proof incorrectly proving that the three angles of ΔPQR sum to 180°: Statements - Reason Draw line ZY parallel to segment PQ -Construction m∠ZRP + m∠PRQ + m∠QRY = m∠ZRY - Angle Addition Postulate ∠ZRP ≅ ∠RPQ - Alternate Interior Angles Theorem ∠QRY ≅ ∠PQR - Alternate Interior Angles Theorem m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = m∠ZRY - Substitution m∠ZRY = 180° - Definition of Supplementary Angles m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = 180° - Substitution Which statement will accurately correct the two-column proof? Which statement will accurately correct the two-column proof? The measure of angle ZRY equals 180° by definition of supplementary angles. Angles QRY and PQR should be proven congruent after the construction of line ZY. The three angles of ΔPQR equal 180° according to the Transitive Property of Equality. Line ZY should be drawn parallel to segment QR.
@MyNameIsNemo
Oh wait, I forgot if you knew how or not.
@RCCB
@the_ocean_girl
I'm not sure whether the way that came out upsets me or not .-.
Wasn't trying to offend. Sorry.. @MyNameIsNemo
Its fine.... I don't really understand the way it's written
@RCCB you have an idea??
It's my last question... any answer will do
I didn't give you guys the answers. ._. @MyNameIsNemo @RCCB @the_ocean_girl
Which statement will accurately correct the two-column proof? The measure of angle ZRY equals 180° by definition of supplementary angles. Angles QRY and PQR should be proven congruent after the construction of line ZY. The three angles of ΔPQR equal 180° according to the Transitive Property of Equality. Line ZY should be drawn parallel to segment QR.
im not sure i cant focus on anything right now
Just going to guess
Go C if youre just guessing
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!