Fill in the blanks with the reasons for the following proof; prove that -(x+y)+x=-y
Theres a chart on the left says statements on the right says rea under statement it says number 1) -(x+y)+x=-x+(-y)+x and it asking for reason
theres 2), 3), 4) i need to fill in
@phi
2)it says =-x+x+(-y) 3)=0+(-y) and number 4)=-y
@freckles
do you know any properties/laws? such as distributive law, commutative property, associative property, additive inverse property....
i think the first one is commutative
commutative property says it is okay to change the order of terms... so are you saying in the first step they did something like write a+b as b+a
no
what is the one in changing parenthesis
can you state what the distributive law says?
ok then thats the one it dont matter where the paranthesis are
2) i just need to change signs right?
change signs?
1) is distributive right?
well what do you think the distributive law says?
u distribute stuff
a(b+c)=?
ab+ac right?
yes
yes a(b+c)=ab+ac is the distributive law isn't that the same thing that happened here: -1(x+y)=-1x+(-1y) or you can also write as -(x+y)=-x+(-y)
k thanks what about 2 i have to finish filling in number and put reason i think i change the signs and its additive inverse property
change the signs? what do you mean by that?
2) shows _____________=-x+x+(-y)
-x+(-y)+x look what happened to the terms; look at the locations of the terms; -x+x+(-y)
ok they move them around
what property says it is okay to change the order of the terms
what numbers do i fill in though
numbers?
I don't know what numbers you mean
I thought we are just giving the reasons
communitive
right commutative property
i have to give the reasons the first one they filled in the numbers the next 3 i have to fill in the first part to make it = what it says
the first one is done for me says -(x+y)+x=-x+(-y)+x
The second one shows _______________=-x+x+(-y)
third one ____________________=0+(-y)
fourth one _____________________=-y
i have to fill in the first part of each
do u see now?
is it hard because it is foir me?
do u know how to do it?
@FibonacciChick666
Didn't we do this already?
its a different one
for the second one do i move the parethensis?
-(x+y)+x=-y
so what is your first step and why?
im confused
ok, where and why?
they moved the parenthesis
did we do this already i cant find it?
oh, I did it with jinxhead
ok
alright. Let's start with the crappy chart
@FibonacciChick666 he said something about typing in numbers also ...do you have any idea what he means?
I thought we were just suppose to give reasons for each of the steps...
so, this idiocy is a two column proof that looks like this. The other person who did this had no idea how to fill it in either.... smh |dw:1445731870558:dw|
ok, so the whole thought for this is how do I fill in the chart. What does each number mean
@narissa I don't see any place in that table to put numbers... So what numbers are you talking about typing in?
it is like that but 1)-(x-y)+x=-x+(-y)+x i put distributive and number 2) i have to fill in the first part______=-x+x+(-y)
im just confused
I'm pretty sure @FibonacciChick666 is right all you have to do is put the reason for each step
we already talked about distributive law and commutative property
ok, so here is how the chart works. #1 on reasons, is given. Always. #2 reason is how you go from step 1 to step 2
what property mentions -x+x=0
#3 reason is how you go from step 2 to step 3
etc
So number two under reasons is distributive property because to go from step one to step two I used the distributive property.
can you fill in 3-5?
ok so 1 is distributive 2 is commutative 3 inverserse and 4 is identity
theres only 1-4
that is 2-5
no, remember what I said 1 always is? There is no step zero, so we can't have a property
but if that is 2-5, then yes
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!