@ganeshie8
ganesh is busy :)
Ganeshieeee I need help understanding something, I'm doing the method of undetermined coefficients for non - homogenous equations. So I have \[y''-2y'+y=te^t+4\] as my second order ode What I don't understand is the \[y_p(t)\] part, let me just show you...haha
Haha, it's cool, you can help me :D
as shultz would say: i know NOTH_THING!!
So I first find the non - homogenous equation, which gives me the fundamental set of \[\huge (e^{R_1t},te^{R_1t})\] as there is one simple solution, so my characteristic equation is \[y(t)=c_1 e^{R_1t}+c_2te^{R_1t}+y_p(t)\] it's actually the +4 part, so would my \[y_p(t) = e^tA_0t+4?\]
y''-2y'+y = t e^t+4 y''-2y'+y = 0 yh = e^(t) (c_1+ c_2 t) yp = e^(t) (f(t)+ t g(t))
first fine the homogenous solution ... yes
instead of constants, let c_1 and c_2 be some function of t yp = e^(t) (f(t)+ t g(t)) insert it and solve for the nonhomegenous solution
My notes are pretty confusing for this...hmm ok let me see because it states \[y_p(x) = x^se^{\alpha x} (A_0+A_1x+...+A_nx^n)\] where S and alpha determine the type of solution
yp is not 4
Yeah I meant to write +4 is where it's confusing haha, and sorry about the tiny font in the last part
I think I do understand the process, just \[y_p(x)\] I'm a bit confused
\[y_p = \color{red}{\cancel{e^{t}~(f+ t~g)}}\] \[-2y'_p = \color{red}{\cancel{-2e^{t}~(f+ t~g)}}\color{green}{\cancel{-2ge^{t}}}-2e^{t}~\underbrace{(f'+tg')}_{=0(why?)}\] \[y''_p = \color{red}{\cancel{e^{t}~(f+ t~g)}}+\color{green}{\cancel{ge^{t}}}+e^t~(f'+ t~g')]+\color{green}{\cancel{ge^{t}}}+g'e^{t}\] \[=t~e^t+4\] ------------- \[-2e^t(f'+tg')=0\\ e^t(f'+tg')+g'e^t=te^t+4\] ----------------- \[f'+tg'=0\\ f'+g'(t+1)+g'=t+4e^{-t}\] solve f' and g' to determine f and g
+g' was meant to be deleted, but forgot it in the process of trying to code it nicely:/
f' = -tg' -tg' +tg' +g' = t+4e^(-t) g' = t+4e^(-t) f' = t^2+4te^(-t)
bah, f' = -(t^2 + 4t e^(-t))
Haha, well the way I learnt, I'm going to set it up, I think I do follow yours..so \[y_p(t) = t^1e^{t}(A_0+A_1t)\] and then I solve for \[A_0, A_1t\] by taking the derivative and etc
Which is the same as solving for f and g in yours
correct
Oooook cool, so I noticed I have to pay very close attention to degree of t and alpha as I presented above
Which helps set up yp
The 4 seemed a bit strange, that's what got me
its just part of the diffyq to start with, ive never tried to guess ahead as to what may transpire, at least not with any degree of accuracy :)
Haha, that sounds good, but I think I should know when I have less than an hour for midterms xD
ive been binge watching doctor who, just in case i need to do exactly that :)
you're also using superposition right
Yup
But I think that has to do with the wronskian...
I suck with math theory lol
I think you might be doing this way already, but stating it here anyways as im not so sure : y''-2y'+y=te^t+ cost + 4 directly using the method of undetermined coefficients is going to be a nightmare for above equation instead, we can use superposition : 1) split the equation : y''-2y'+y=te^t y''-2y'+y=cost y''-2y'+y= 4 2) find a particular solution for each equation using undetermined coeff thingy 3) add up all the solutions
Ooh, no we never did that
then you will feel amazed using it for the first time it saves lot of donkey work when the function on right hand side is long
So basically you're solving 3 non homogenous equations, I could see how that's probably a bit faster
solving 3 independent equations is always faster than solving a system of 3 dependent equations
Ok nice, because not all of them require undetermined coeff right?
oh nvm
you wont know the power of superposition unless you use it few times
its not a good idea to learn new stuff 1 hour before the midterm, so maybe save that for later :) if you ever take linear circuits, you will get a chance to see the beauty of superposition in fullest !
Haha, well I was just stating because we have midterms that are 50 minutes long xD, it's not for a while
I'm just working on an assignment, as all my questions are based on them
Ahh then you should definitely learn how to use superposition with undetermined coefficients
Alright cool, I'll definitely look into it, I also have a question that requires variation of parameters where you have to use reduction of order, which is going to suck
Oh and a linear ode with y^(6) omg xD
Ok thanks ganeshie and amistre
looks you're having lots of fun ;) good luck !
Yeah..great way to spend the weekend that's for sure >_>
@amistre64 are you watching season9 it on tv ? we don't get BBC in our present dish plan i started watching doctor who couple of weeks back completed first 3 seasons, about to start 4th season...
Haha, nice, I've only seen some of season 1, and now it's already on season 9...I'll have to catch up in the summer
first 3 seasons are not so great, none of the characters are likeable so far... at least to me.. i guess im watching it because some episodes are good and it is a nice science fiction
If you want to watch some awesome sciencefiction and just cool fiction in general, check out the twilight zone, you will definitely not regret it, a lot of shows including Dr. Who have copied it over time, the original (black and white) is amazing.
do you know any nice site to watch these for free ? i have been watching here http://www.couchtuner.la/watch-doctor-who-online-11/ but this site doesn't seem to have twilight zone
Nope. most of the links to videos are broken in that site
Ah, well first episode I tried works, you can probably just google "watch .... free online" and a lot of links will come
Of course this is all legal *cough*
@ganeshie8 i started watching it back when i was like 10 years old ... so ive been catching up on the classic series :)
first and second doctors have alot of missing episodes that are lost, been using .... dailymotion for the most part, and some hulu from my sisters account
Doctor who is on netflix, not sure if it has all seasons though
Ah yes, all seasons are on it! Nice!
wasnt sure how id like the new doctors, 10 and 11 ... but after watching them they turned out pretty awesome. still like the classics tho
oh so the doctor changes in each season is it ? over the first four seasons, doctor has changed only one time... im not liking this doctor, so can't wat to finish this season to see a fresh face lol http://www.couchtuner.la/watch-doctor-who-online-11/ above link is very good, i watched every episode in frist 3 seasons from that site w/o any problems
Have you seen the twilight zone ever amistre?
the doctor 'regenerates' when his lifespan/contract requires it :)
used to watch the old black and white TZs
Hehe yes, it's amazing
the first doctor back in teh 60s was old and ill/dyeing, so they decided to go for a 'regeneration' ability .... allows new actors and adventures to expand the series with
Did not know that, you sir are a true whovian
lol, got noting better to do to pass the time :)
i think i recall a twilight zone, a bogey man under this kids bed was stealing/killing kids at night. but his rule was that he could not harm the kid whose bed he slept under. one night while at the park, the kid is talking to a bogeyman, and at the end you find out that it is one from a different kids bed ....
Ohhh yeah, I remember that one, that was in later years I think from the 80s, the stories they would come up with...
I think you can find some of these episodes on youtube
you can, and i believe alfred hitchcoc.k was in the same genre
For sure, also a lot of actors were involved in TTZ
1212. im headed out ... have fun :)
Later, thanks for the help
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!