Find all solutions of \(980x \equiv 1500 (mod 1600)\) Please , help
When solving Diophantine, I got the final equation is \(980 (-31) - 1600(-19) =20\) Multiple both sides by 75, I got \(980 (-2325) - 1600 (-1425) = 1500\) But I don' t know how to get the answer from back of the book x = 75 + 80 k
@ganeshie8
You could reduce the amount of work by dividing out any common factors
\(980x \equiv 1500 \pmod {1600}\) divide 20 through out and get \(49x \equiv 75 \pmod {80}\)
both congruences are "equivalent"
Can I? I didn't see any theorem or corollary allows me to do that. However, suppose I can, then?
You don't really need a huge theorem to do that, just write out what a congruence means and use divisibility argument
\(980x \equiv 1500 \pmod {1600} \iff 1600 \mid (980x-1500)\) yes ?
yes
\(980x \equiv 1500 \pmod {1600} \iff 1600 \mid (980x-1500)\) \(\iff 80*20 \mid 20(49x-75)\) yes ?
yes
can we say \(ab \mid ac \iff b \mid c\) ?
yes
\(980x \equiv 1500 \pmod {1600} \iff 1600 \mid (980x-1500)\) \(\iff 80*20 \mid 20(49x-75)\) \(\iff 80 \mid (49x-75)\) yes ?
yes, :)
good :)
Now, I solve this equivalent and the result is the same with original one, right?
Yep. your original equation is like 2y + 2x = 2 your new equation is like y + x = 1 they have same solutions because they are identical equations
Thank you so much, let me try.
you may double check with wolfram http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+49x%3D75+mod+80
Question : if we deduce the congruence like above, we miss one solution. Problem: Solve \(9x\equiv 6~(mod~15)\) 1) Solve as it is: 9x -15y = 6 gcd (9,15) =3 15 = 9 + 6 9 = 6 + 3 6 = (2) 3 + 0 Hence 3 = 9 - 6 = 9 - ( 15 -9) = (2) 9 - 15 Hence 6 = (4) 9 -(2) 15 \(x_0 = 4 \\x = 4 + \dfrac{15}{3}t; t={0,1,2}\) Hence \(x = \overline 4; x= \overline 9; x =\overline {14}\) 2) deduce \(9x\equiv 6 ~(mod~15)\\3x\equiv 2~(mod~5)\) That is, we need find 3x -5y = 2 gcd (3,5) =1 5 = 3 + 2 --> 2 = 5 - 3 3 = 2 + 1--> 1 = 3 -2 1 = 3- (5 - 3) = (2) 3 -5 hence 3(4) - 5(2) = 2 \(x_0 = 4: x = 4 +5t: t =\{0,1\}\) Then \(x = \overline 4 ~~or~~ x=\overline 9\). We miss \(x =\overline {14}\) @ganeshie8
what makes you think we're missign x=14 ?
@Loser66
if it is mod 5, then x =14 = 4 , but we have to solve for mod 15, hence x = 14 must be one of the solutions. If we make the equivalent congruent as above and solve it, we don't have x =14 as it is in original one.
I see what you're thinking. For the congruence, \(9x\equiv 6 ~\pmod{15}\), the solution is \(x\equiv 4\pmod{5}\). How do you express that solution in parameter form ?
@Loser66
@ganeshie8
I don't get your question, x =4 mod 5 , \(x = 4 + 5t\)
Yes, what integers does that solution include ? Maybe write out first few
1
0
don't wry about the mod, just write out the integers, x, that satisfy \(9x\equiv 6\pmod{15}\)
x = 4, 9, 14
why only 3 ? doesn't -1 satisfy the congruence ?
because -1 =4 mod 5
I said, forget about mod
oh, because we have the congruent class, not a concrete number.
and -1 belongs to {14 bar}
write out first few integers, x, that satisfy the given congruence
I'm just asking you to write out first few integer, x, that satisfy the given congruence. That is a simple question. You don't really need to use mod.
-1,4,6
is it not that when we write out something, we need a mod to calculate ? like if you say 9x = 6 , I have to know on which mod to write out some solutions. If I don't have any mode, how can I know them since 9x =6 mod 2 differ from mod 3, mod 4, mod 5 and so on. ... I hate to be dummy like this but I do not get even a "simple question" like what you think.
we don't "need" another congruence to write out solutions to a congruence.
Let me write out few solutions to the congruence \(9x\equiv 6\pmod{15}\) : the integers \(x = 4,9,14,-1,-6\) satisfy above congruence
I think you should teach me all. I can learn quickly. It is better than you ask something you assume that I knew but I didn't. :)
I am pretty sure you knew the theory. It's just that you had never used congruences much, you're finding it difficult to interpret them properly...
As you can see, every element in the set, \(\{4+5t : t\in \mathbb{Z}\}\), is a solution to the congruence \(9x\equiv 6\pmod{15}\)
Sanity is back
But that set form looks ugly when to do arithmetic, so we express the solutions in congruence form instead : \(x\equiv 4\pmod{5}\)
When we say, \(x\equiv 4\pmod{5}\) is the solution, we're saying that the infinite set \(\{4+5t : t\in \mathbb{Z}\}\) is the solution.
but in class, it is not all t in Z, they are remainder of division by gcd ( a, b) on ax + by = c
I said, forget about mod
ok
the question is about finding the solutions to given congruence not about how we express them
But if somebody asks you to list out the "incongruent" solutions in mod 15, what would you list ?
then you can say a set of "incongruent" solutions in mod 14 is : \(\{4,9,14\}\)
Somebody else comes up and asks you to list out the "incongruent" solutions in mod 5, then you would give them a set with one element : \(\{4\}\)
Somebody else comes up and asks you to list out the "incongruent" solutions in mod 10, then you would give them a set with one element : \(\{4,9\}\)
As you can see all those answers are same. They all give the set \(\{4+5t : t\in \mathbb{Z}\}\).
\(\{4,9,14\}\) in mod 15 is same as \(\{4\}\) in mod 5 is same as \(\{4,9\}\) in mod 10 is same as \(\{4+5t : t\in \mathbb{Z}\}\)
they all generate the same integers as solutions. they are just different but equivalent ways to express the solution to congruence \(9x\equiv 6\pmod{15}\)
It doesn't matter how you express the final solution if the textbook doesn't ask you explicitly
Ofcourse simply saying \(x\equiv 4\pmod{5}\) is the solution looks better. "Congruence" is just a short hand "notation" which makes expressing divisibility statements compact. Nothing more.
It is new to me. I have to digest it completely. Thanks a lot.
np, just ask if something is not clear. i think we are messing with two formats of expressing the solutions : 1) all the solutions of a congruence 2) incongruent solutions under specific mod you don't "need" to give the solutions in second format. just know that we can simply write out the solution in set form
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!