Prove that if lim(x→c) f(x) = L then lim(x→c) 7 f(x) = 7L.
Hey, Welcome to Open Study! :) What do they mean by prove? Using Epsilon-Delta definition of a limit? Or just basic Limit Properties?
Using the Epsilon-Delta definition.
Hmm ok lemme see if my line of thinking makes sense here...
\(\large\rm \lim\limits_{x\to c}~f(x)=L\) means that for all \(\rm \epsilon>0\) there exists a \(\rm \delta>0\) such that \(\rm 0<|x-c|<\delta\) when x is within delta of c, \(\rm |f(x)-L|<\epsilon\) then f(x) is within epsilon of L.
Hence when \(\large\rm |f(x)-L|<\epsilon\) it should follow that \(\large\rm 7|f(x)-L|<7\epsilon\), and \(\large\rm |7f(x)-7L|<7\epsilon\).
Let \(\large\rm \delta=7\epsilon\) so that when \[\large\rm 0<|x-c|<\delta\]we have\[\large\rm |7f(x)-7L|<\epsilon^*\](Where epsilon*=7epsilon). This definition should hold `for all` epsilon, ya? And then relate it back to the definition of limit I guess? Therefore, by definition of limit,\[\large\rm \lim_{x\to c}7f(x)=7L\]
Am I doing that right? >.< Hmm thinkinggg
Looks good so far.
Mmm ya I think that makes sense. We have some new epsilon, a larger epsilon, \(\rm 7\epsilon\), and we're simply showing that we can still find a delta such that the definition holds true. Ya I would go with something like that. :) I know my notes are a little sloppy, hopefully you can make sense of that though.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!