Help trig proofs
The equation \[e^{i \pi}+1=0 \] is sometimes called Eulers equations. One of his identies is \[e^{i \pi} = cosx +isinx\]
Verify Eulers equation using Eulers identity stated above. HInt: let x=pi
so this mean \[e^{i \pi}=\cos \pi+isin \pi\]
cospi = 1 sin pi =0 \[e^{e \pi} + 1=0\]
@ganeshie8
\[\large \color{brown}{e}^{\color{red}{i}\color{purple}{\pi}} +\color{blue}{1}=\color{magenta}{0}\] do you see why this equation is so beautiful ?
Yes, but this is my first time seeing this. When exactly is this used?
It is from complex analysis. Notice that it has \(5\) most used math symbols : \[e,i,\pi,1,0\]
It does indeed. Could you assist with the next parts. It builds upon this
\[\large e^{i\color{red}{x}} = \cos \color{red}{x} + i\sin \color{red}{x}\] you're using that right ?
Yes :)
\[\large e^{i\color{red}{\pi}} = \cos \color{red}{\pi} + i\sin \color{red}{\pi} = -1 + i0 = -1\]
Next part of the question says verify the next two Euler identities. \[sinx=\frac{ e^{ix} - e^{-ix} }{ 2i}\] and \[cosx=\frac{ e^{ix}+e^{-ix} }{ 2 }\]
As you said, everythign follows from the definition : \[\large e^{i\color{red}{x}} = \cos \color{red}{x} + i\sin \color{red}{x}\]
so we can replace e^ix with cosx+isinx?
cept in the case of -i ?
\(\large e^{i\color{red}{x}} = \cos \color{red}{x} + i\sin \color{red}{x}\) \(\large e^{i(\color{red}{-x})} = \cos (\color{red}{-x}) + i\sin (\color{red}{-x})\)
Add them, what do you get ?
\[\sin \pi= \frac{ (\cos \pi+isin \pi)-(\cos -\pi+isin -\pi) }{ 2i}\]
forget about \(\pi\), we're done with that..
But it wants us to verify the identity
also it gave a hint to use what we got in part a
Oh ok.. you want to verify the identity at \(x=\pi\) is it ?
then it looks good :) keep going ...
Oh wait "subtitute identity from part a in the right side of the idtentity and simplify. So i beleive you are right
\[\sin x= \frac{ (\cos x+isin x)-(\cos -x+isin -x) }{ 2i}\] like that ?
Yes sorry about miss reading
So we can multiply 2i to the other side?
so we get 2isinx= (2isinx)?
since the cosines get subtracted and the -x for sin is pulled out in front making it isinx+isinx?
Yes
numerator becoems isinx+isinx = 2isinx
Does this mean we verified it?
have we ?
No because we arent proving one side is equal to the other?
we are solving it
Right hand side : \(\large \frac{ (\cos x+i\sin x)-(\cos(-x)+i\sin (-x)) }{ 2i}\) \(\large = \frac{ 2i\sin x }{ 2i}\) \(\large =\sin x\)
which is same as the left hand side so we have verified that identity...
I thought verifying and proving were different things oops
In general they are different things, in our case they seem to be same yeah :)
Its fun how math works like this :p
So the next part is Use Eulers identities to write sin(1+i) in the standard form a+bi. Round to 3 decimal places
\[\sin x=\frac{ e^{ix} - e^{-ix} }{ 2i}\] plugin \(x = 1+i\)
So is this using the one we just verified then?
Yes that is what i thought I see the pattern
Also, notice that many exponent identities work just fine with complex numbers too : \[e^{a+ib} = e^a*e^{ib}\]
|dw:1448087323973:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!