Someone Please Help Me!!! I will give a medal and I will be a follower of you!
Federal law requires that news agencies not publish or broadcast information that could threaten the security of the nation's armed forces in times of conflict. However, the Constitution protects the right to free expression of ideas. Judges use past decisions on cases where the law and rights come into conflict to settle similar disputes. In one case, New York Times vs. United States, the Supreme Court decided that a newspaper could publish information about the military that the president said should remain secret to protect the troops. The justices said the president failed to prove that the information could threaten the nation's security. Federal officials accuse an online newspaper of violating the law against publishing secret information about the military. One of the newspaper's reporters posted comments online about her friend, who is a soldier serving overseas. On her personal website, she posted a picture of him, where he is stationed, and negative opinions of his commanders, including the president. The newspaper insists that the reporter did this on her own time and that the newspaper is not responsible. The reporter maintains that whether at work or not, she has the right to express her opinions freely under the Constitution. U.S. government officials say that the posting of the information could put the soldier in harm's way. Officials also say that her negative opinions could encourage others to stop supporting the soldiers and break laws in protest. They insist that because a reporter for the newspaper, people could believe that her ideas are those of everyone working for the newspaper. They say the newspaper and the reporter have threatened the safety and security of the armed forces. Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? This is a matter of constitutional law. I know this because this case is related to a person’s rights, and is associated with the constitutional law. I know this information because I learned it in my lesson. Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or a combination? How do you know? The source of law is a __________. I know this because ___________________. Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________ Do you think the reporter has a valid argument? In other words, should government change the law or make an exception? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. I think that the reporter has a ______ argument. I think that government should ______________.
Please
I will help you
Okay we will start off with the first question
so for the first question there are four answer choices can you guess which one it is
hmm, is it regulation?
quick question what class is this
civics
okay thanks
regulations is correct
that was a wild guess :P
good job next question
how do you know
well, like i said, i guessed, but let me think about the answer i put out there.......
okay sure
help!! plz
ok well it's regulations because it is a rule or law designed to control or govern conduct.
without we wouldn't have these things
for the next question It says the state recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means. It looks like she trusted him with car without making him sign a contract so that he'd have to pay. A word of mouth contract after she legally signed away ownership. The law is INTENDED to help people's safety and rights but intention isn't good enough (see: drug war :))
very good
okay next question
great
next question
Thank u so much!!!!!
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!